Navegando por Autor "GOMES, Geise do Socorro Lima"

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Análise de documentos que compõem as noções acerca das práticas de "exploração de trabalhadores rurais": um estudo genealógico
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2011) GOMES, Geise do Socorro Lima; LEMOS, Flávia Cristina Silveira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8132595498104759
This paper presents a foucauldian genealogical analysis concerned discursive practices of power directed at workers, especially in rural areas, which constitute the object of "slave labor". We started from the different nomenclatures that are used to describe the practices of exploitation of workers in Brazil, to give visibility to the different fields struggle which materialize in objectification and subsequent subjectivity of these workers. We hypothesized that there is in this power-knowledge game disputes involving government control practices and biopolitical mechanisms operated by various segments that are called upon to arbitrate about people lives through the scope of work. Each nomenclature, thus, would occupy a strategic position in order to "defend", "represent" the field of knowledge which speaks about. These disputes culminate in the production of documents, some of whom were chosen to be analyzed in this work dissertational. These are documents of national and international level, so that these practices were problematized in two levels, as they realize they both interpolate and sometimes they are rivaled each other in creating strategies and tactics conducted for the care and management of workers. Thus, it was found, throughout cut series of documents over, that grows a demand for application of punishment of those found guilty of carrying out exploitative practices, and among others approached series, there is an extension of a tutelary complex, which begins to be encouraged to control and surveillance of workers, encouraged by international organizations like the International Labour Organization, and other movements and civil society groups, which help in producing public politics that often end up functioning as a form of control risks that possibly these workers are subordinate, using statistics to justify their interventions. Take notice, therefore, that a paradox of biopower pass over these practices, placing them in a field of management and control of life, where we ask ourselves: indeed are the human rights and dignity of these people taken into account or only occupy a place within the field of possible events to be controlled by practices of governmentality? We conclude by trying to articulate these issues to the production of names used to describe the practices of exploitation of workers by placing them in government strategies of the population.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Dispositivo-formação em psicologia: processos medicalizantes, silenciamentos, diferenças
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-04-07) GOMES, Geise do Socorro Lima; GALINDO, Dolores Cristina Gomes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6781116835399339; LEMOS, Flávia Cristina Silveira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8132595498104759
The finality of this research was to analyze how the training-device in psychology is constituted from documents that engender the relations of knowledge, power and subjectivation, inciting medical practices. We deploy this goal in the following guiding questions: What conditions of possibilities allowed the construction of the Pedagogical Political Project of the Psychology Course of the Federal University of Pará of the year 2010 in order to operate medical practices? By means of which devices of power-knowledge do these practices materialize as a biopower in the formation of the psychologist? What circulating forces operate through the project and in the project composing knowledge presented as important for the practice of the profession of psychologist, researcher and professor in psychology? How can the production of the difference be evident in this curriculum proposal of 2010 as resistance to the medicalization processes? This thesis was based on the consideration that insofar as the curriculum is a multiplicity, it is asserted that among the various elements that compose it and make it work there are medicalizing elements in discursive differences, being produced by this curriculum of UFPA psychology, and these medicalizing practices function as a reductive control filter in the processes of difference production practices. This curriculum is therefore apprehended as a strategy of know-power-subjectivation that sets in motion a training device evidencing a medicalizing logic within the mechanism of biopower, since both resources, tactics, strategies, knowledge that are producers are triggered of subjectivation modes of this subject that is intended to form, as well as at broader levels of government of the population, inserting the analysis of the psychologist's formation within the governmentality strategies underlined by the education policies developed in Brazil. The theoretical-methodological framework used to examine these objectives was focused on the theoretical and archaeological production of the French thinker Michel Foucault, using as main analytical operators the concepts of: device, knowledge, power, governmentality, norm, medicalization. In the curriculum, we align this reference to curricular studies that take this same perspective as analytical trigger, as found in the authors: Veiga-Neto, Silvio Gallo, Sandra Corazza, Tomaz Tadeu and Thomas Popkewitz. The study was based on documentary analysis coming from public domain documents and documents produced from conversational wheels and individual interviews. It is concluded that the formation in psychology acting in the configuration of a device has its sedimentation points, but also places of fractures. In this way reverberates in the formation in psychology of the UFPA, heterogeneous elements that during the history of the formation of the psychologies in Brazil punctuated and updated medical practices. In the multiplicity of power relations these practices are also questioned, extending the focus of medical practices to the practices of psychology within the field of governmentalities. However, one of the reducing effects of the processes of difference in this formation in the UFPA has been seen in the little incidence given to the regional aspects, which could bring the specificity of the knowledge production to be developed in the Amazon Region.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Tramas, redes e escafandristas: notas sobre a educação e o comum na pesquisa em Psicologia
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2016-08) SANTOS, Daniele Vasco; LEMOS, Flávia Cristina Silveira; GOMES, Geise do Socorro Lima; GALINDO, Dolores Cristina Gomes
This article aims to reflect theoretically about the common experience of the plan dimensions in research through the composition of plots favoring collective assemblages of knowledge, power and subjectivity. The search for intercessors and networking enables invent and politicize relations, bodies, thought the production of truth incarnated and crossed by emotions. Knowledge is shared legacy and result of meetings between powerful conversations and questions, in the plot of heterogeneous forces and multiple that constitute them. Mainstreaming and multiply intercessors for transdisciplinary practice involves expanding perspectives, slide the institutional and subjective places to denature the crystallized practices and produce new collaborative stories between researchers and teachers, in psychology and in education.