Navegando por Autor "RIBEIRO, Maria Edilene da Silva"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A gestão universitária: um estudo na UFPA, de 2001 a 2011
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2013-04-19) RIBEIRO, Maria Edilene da Silva; CHAVES, Vera Lúcia Jacob; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3533444052532463
The research hereby presented had as its main objective and focus the university management in the Federal University of Para - UFPA (State of Para, Brazil), with emphasis to participation and autonomy in the process of institutional decision-making within the context of the reform of the State, in the years 2001 through 2011. It consisted of a case study that departed from the premise that, within the context of neoliberal reforms and by means of rules and regulations both national and international, the model of managerialism is being spread throughout the institutions of the social sectors, such as the universities, which takes place under internal consent and according to guidelines that approximate them to the market, causing participation to be restricted to collegiate and autonomy to be devalued. In UFPA, actions of the Superior Councils such as reformulation of legal framework, planning processes, election of directors, among others, have been adjusted to the principles underlying the guidelines mentioned above, and thereby university management is being remodeled. The method of dialectical historical materialism was used in order to analyze the conflicts and contradictions present in the model of management adopted by UFPA. The data were gathered in a number of sources, namely minutes, regiments and resolutions of the institution as well as in Brazilian legislation and documents issued by international organizations. Also, semi-structured interviews with nine subjects and direct observation of the meetings of the Councils were conducted, from September/2010 through September/2011. Analysis was carried on regarding: - theoretical conceptions of management and its transposition to the educational sector within the context of the capitalist society; - the model of managerialist management and its relation to the neoliberal reforms of the State as well as of Higher Education, departing from regulations issued by the federal government in accordance to the international organizations; - the main conflicts inherent to the university management, in UFPA, with emphasis to the statutory reformulation, the choice of directors, and the institutional planning process; - the materialization of the university management through the actuation of the UFPA Superior Councils. Results indicate that the model of management founded upon the principles of managerialism has been adopted in UFPA being consented by the Superior Councils and expressed in the processes of elaboration of the new Statute of UFPA, the Plan of Institutional Development (PDI), and the Program for the Support to Plans of Restructure and Expansion of Federal Universities (REUNI); in the choice of the major administrators; and in the actuation of the Superior Councils. Such aspects demonstrate the relation to the guidelines and regulations issued by the neoliberal State and international organizations, and indicate a model of management that, on the one side, does not allow for collective participation while restricts the UFPA institutional autonomy, and on the other, promotes distancing from debate and from the implementation of an emancipatory project.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Políticas de avaliação institucional da educação superior: o caso da Universidade Federal do Pará
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2008-04-04) RIBEIRO, Maria Edilene da Silva; CHAVES, Vera Lúcia Jacob; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3533444052532463
This research intitled Institutional Evaluation Policies in Higher Education: the case of the Federal University of Para, has the Brazilian policies for institutional evaluation as its core object, within the context of the capitalist system development; its main objective was to investigate how such policies have been implemented in Brazilian higher education and, in particular, in the Federal University of Para (UFPA). The research hypothesis assumed that the institutional evaluation policies implemented in Brazil, from the 1990s on, are founded upon, and oriented by the neoliberal logic marked by features quantitative, competitive, productivist, fragmented, distanced from reality; that they follow out determinations from multilateral orgnizations, such as the World Bank; that they have been used as mechanisms of States control over education. Case study was chosen as the appropriate methodological approach, on the grounds of quanti-qualitative research procedures. Data and information necessary to the study were collected from a number of documental sources, and were analyzed at the light of theoretical support obtained by means of literature review mainly that regarding the concept of emancipatory evaluation from the standpoint of authors such as Dias Sobrinho, Vasconcelos, Maués, Chaves, among others. Three models of evaluation policies were analyzed which have been implemented in Brazil, namely the Program of Institutional Evaluation of Brazilian Universities (PAIUB), the National Exam of Undergraduate Courses, and the National System of Higher Education Evaluation (SINAES). As for preliminary conclusions, evidence was found that evalution policies implemented nation-wide in Brazil are based upon neoliberal concepts of evaluation, as they serve the process of economization of higher education, the latter having its principles, quality requirements, and autonomy modified. Such a process, among other values and purposes, contributes to the control of educational institutions by the State; its results influence relationships among institutions, and they assign new meanings to the concept of higher education. As for the case study regarding the Federal University of Para, research findings indicate that the three evaluation models adopted by UFPA at different points in time followed the same neoliberal conceptions; that they function as instruments of regulation and control; they did not allow for the participation of the academic community in the processes of evaluation discussion and development, and therefore they have distanced from the academic reality; last but not least, that such models did not evaluate the entirety of the institution as they proceeded in fragmented, stagnant features which hampers the autonomous development of the University.