Navegando por Autor "SOARES, Raimunda Lucena Melo"

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Filosofia da educação: limites e possibilidades na formação do pedagogo
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2012-05-29) SOARES, Raimunda Lucena Melo; SEIBT, Cezar Luís; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7464213317216078
The present work is on the Philosophy of Education, from the standpoint of its limitations and possibilities, as practical and theoretical activity that focuses on educational problems. The Philosophy of Education in educator’s formation may consist of either a solution to educational problems, because of its critical perspective as a problem especially if it does not recognize its own limits. Thus, the problem that drives this study relates to the limits of the discipline Philosophy of Education in the pedagogue formation and the issues that guide the investigations made here are: What possibilities and limits does the Philosophy of Education have in pedagogue training? Where can we place them? What the Brazilian theorists say about the Philosophy of Education? And this, as a subject, as conceived by its teachers and students at the School of Education? With the main goal of analyzing the participation of Philosophy of Education, its limits and possibilities in educator formation, asking in which environments we can place them in order that this discipline is a set of knowledge linked to two major areas of knowledge: Philosophy and Education, in their complexities, contradictions and connections were chosen as the main source of research works of authors who conceive education as a social-historical process, philosophy and the philosophy of education in their specific critical and reflective, as well as the teachers and students of the Faculty of Education testimony from the Federal University of Pará, Pará State University and University of Amazonia, in the 1990s, which gave interviews about the epistemological interest of this study. The data analysis allowed to observe that the limits, but also the possibilities of the discipline Philosophy of Education are made in the relations among Philosophy of Education and Education, Philosophy, and educational practice of teachers and students and the contradictions made into these theoretical and practical context areas of knowledge, according to the needs and contingencies to which they are subjected in social and historical context.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Filosofia da educação: sua história no ensino médio normal e no curso de pedagogia da UFPA
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2005-01) MONTEIRO, Maria Neusa; SOARES, Raimunda Lucena Melo
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Limites epistemológicos da filosofia dialética na produção do conhecimento científico em educação
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-06-06) SOARES, Raimunda Lucena Melo; CORRÊA, Paulo Sérgio de Almeida; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7102416953096612
Study on the complexity of the epistemological limitations of the dialectical philosophy in researches in the field of education. How are the epistemological limitations of dialectical philosophy configured in research in education, despite the recognition of its heuristic capacity and its logical organicity? What is the place of importance attributed to the Dialectic Philosophy within the production of scientific knowledge in the field of educational research in Brazil? What is the Dialectic Philosophy receptivity in the investigative practices of researchers in education in Brazil? How to setup the scientific research method and what themes and study objects are privileged in the construction of scientific knowledge in education? What are the epistemological limits in dialectical approach when its assumptions are applied in the construction of doctoral theses from the Graduate Program in Education? The general objective of the study was to understand and expose the epistemological limits that permeate the formation of researchers and the construction of scientific knowledge in the area of education under the influence of Dialectical Philosophy. Specifically, it aims to analyze the importance given to Dialectic Philosophy in knowledge production in theses developed within the Postgraduate Programs of education area; to reflect on the receptivity of the Dialectic Philosophy in the investigative practices of researchers in education and contributions of historical dialectical materialism for the researcher formation in this subject area; to discuss the construction of knowledge logic expressed in the research methods used in the doctoral theses aiming the production of scientific knowledge in education area; and analyze the epistemological implications of the dialectical approach in the production of scientific knowledge resulting from doctoral theses. Starting from an epistemological approach based on Dialectical Philosophy, especially materialism and historical ones. The bibliographical and documentary sources were chosen as the main basis of the research, highlighting works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Hegel and doctoral thesis supervised by Professors Antônio Joaquim Severino and Dermeval Saviani. The historical time span of the research covered the period from 1974 to 2015. I could see that the dialectical approach in educational research, including in its historical materialist conception, presents limitations that are not only of the order of the theoretical insufficiency of the researchers who adopt their presuppositions in the researches they carry out, but because of the complexity in which the tensions originate Epistemological implications implicit in such philosophy, due to the contradictory character in which the movement of the real and its own logic is established, the difficulty of putting into practice dialectical historical materialism, in the perspective of the praxis transforming reality, as well as the way authors construct their heuristic objects and methods in the process of producing scientific knowledge. Therefore, the multiplicity of dimensions and relations of the object in the historical context implies still more in the complex presence of the limits of the dialectic, in spite of its heuristic capacity in the researches in education. Based on the principle of contradiction, I have been able to conclude that these limits are explained by principles and conceptions at the heart of dialectical logic, both from an ideal point of view and from a material perspective, and which are forged along with epistemological possibilities. Finally I inquire and point out some vestiges of the limitations faced in the construction of this thesis.