Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGD/ICJ
URI Permanente desta comunidadehttps://repositorio.ufpa.br/handle/2011/3417
O Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito (PPGD) iniciou suas atividades em 1984 e integra o Instituto de Ciências Jurídicas (ICJ) da Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), que, por sua vez, se originou da Faculdade Livre de Direito do Pará, uma das mais antigas do país, fundada em 1902.
Navegar
Navegando Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGD/ICJ por CNPq "CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO INTERNACIONAL PUBLICO"
Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Caso Ximenes Lopes vs. Brasil: responsabilidade do Estado e Ordem Jurídica Internacional(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2007) TORRES, Gustavo Oriol Mendonça; BRITO FILHO, José Cláudio Monteiro de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7823839335142794The human rights violation of people who suffer from mental issues was recognized by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The case Ximenes lopes Vs Brasil has reveled in which ways the State, who should be the biggest guardian of this groups’s rights, used do take actions of isolation, maltreatment in psychiatric hospitals that didn’t respect the human dignity. The conditions in which the death of Damião Ximenes Lopes happened, showed the inhuman and degrading actions that were wrongly taken in our country. The Inter-American Court besides determining the payment of pecuniary indemnity asked the Brazilian State to guarantee that theses violations won’t happen again. The Federal Govern, because of theses facts, has structured a process of uninstitutionalization of pacients in psychiatric institutions, which has brought great advances, but hasn’t represented the real necessity of people who need them. The evaluation of these programs reminds us the fundamental discussion about how the Inter-American System of Human Rights may supervise theses steps of non-repetition, contributing to a new view about people with mental issues.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Diálogo entre cortes: a recepção da jurisprudência da corte interamericana de direitos humanos no Brasil: uma análise das decisões dos Tribunais Regionais Federais e do Superior Tribunal de Justiça(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-06-16) ALBUQUERQUE, Lígia Chiari Mendes; MAUÉS, Antonio Gomes Moreira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5100632338260364The present work analyzes the judicial dialogue between the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR), the Brazilian Federal Regional Courts and The Superior Court of Justice. It is understood that Brazil is inserted in a context of legal pluralism, since it is subjected to more than one human rights protection order. To reconcile these orders is necessary to seek a non-hierarchical solution, being the judicial dialogue one of them. The work analyzes the types of dialogue, the ways in which the courts can relate to and the position of national judges in relation to the regional law on human rights. We, then, searched the websites of the Brazilian Courts objects of this study to identify decisions that used the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court as a reasoning for deciding the cases. From these results it was concluded that the judicial dialogue between these courts is still in it’s early point, depending in many times on the personal initiative of certain magistrates, although we have found some significant results qualitatively, that shows that the dialogue is possible and would be positive as in protecting human rights.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) A efetividade do Sistema Interamericano de direitos humanos: análise dos casos brasileiros na Comissão Interamericana de Direitos Humanos(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2005) TEREZO, Cristina Figueiredo; MAUÉS, Antonio Gomes Moreira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5100632338260364The present research is about the effectiveness of the Inter-American Human Rights System with regard to Brazilian cases as well as the general situation of Human Rights violations in Brazil This study starts from presentation of Human Rights concepts and foundation, to analyze the consolidation of international protection with emergence of the systems for the promotion and garanty of Human Rights, in universal and regional levels, with emphasis on the Inter-American Human Rights System, over which it is made an analysis of its main organs: Inter-American Court and Commission. In the Inter-American Commission study, while describing its jurisdiction, admissibility requirements and course of individual petitions, it is presented Brazilian cases currently in the Commission, identified through the analysis of its annual reports, available in its electronic address. Herewith, it is envisaged the overall picture of the cases that are sent to Inter-American Commission, given that, as a rule, they do not exhaust domestic remedies, which is one of the admissibility requirements of individual petitions. Therefore, they are sent based on a exception, that is, the one of unwarranted delay of the domestic remedies to protect the violation of Human Rights occurred in Brazil, which makes the Inter-American System not a supplementary or coadjuvant body. In order to analyze the effectiveness of the Inter-American System for the promotion and garanty of Human Rights in Brazil, it is presented the monitoring that the Commission carries out since 1997, when it made Recommendations about the general situation of Human Rights violation, based on its in loco visit to the country in 1995; and with the analysis of Brazilian cases currently in Inter-American Commission, it is also identified which individual complaints originated Recommendations to Brazil and, thus, their relationship with public policies, legislative innovations and modifications that took place internaly.