Navegando por CNPq "CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL"

Agora exibindo 1 - 8 de 8

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Conceitos jurídicos indeterminados e o novo código de processo civil: normas de textura aberta e parâmetros da discricionariedade judicial
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-10-09) PINHEIRO NETO, Pedro Bentes; GÓES, Gisele Santos Fernandes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1305423832262115
The paper discusses legal indeterminacy in the new civil procedure law, contributing towards a comprehension of the open standards texture. To do so, we will analyze neoprocessualism as a new methodology of studying civil procedure law. We used theoretical framework as positivist authors to disclose the meaning of the legal indeterminacy, reaching a practical technique to application in a case law. The research involves the study of application, interpretation and judicial discretion. By the end, some parameters for limited using of judicial discretion.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
O convencimento judicial e a valoração probatória
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2013) CROELHAS, Clívia Renata Loureiro; GÓES, Gisele Santos Fernandes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1305423832262115
This dissertation aims to analyze how the judges work with respect evaluates evidence in the civil suit, precisely in regard to judicial conviction, and how this convictions are exposed in decisions motivation. In this way, preliminarily studied a bit about the institute of proof, and then arrive in a discussion about the change of paradigm caused by the influence of Fundamental Rights emanating from Federal Constitution 1988 in the Brasilian law, and so explain about the existents evaluates models of the proofs, and their ability to eliminate judicial discretion, forward the current complexity of the demands put on trial. Started to look for assistance in compared doctrine for institutes that can be transported to the usual national practice, and complement argumentation, and necessary motivation motivates so that the correct standard of proof could give rise to a conviction court properly motivated, which makes the ideal democratic state.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Legitimidade ativa na ação civil pública: um modelo independente de acesso judicial para a tutela de direitos fundamentais
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2009-08-14) FREITAS, Marlene Rodrigues Medeiros; GÓES, Gisele Santos Fernandes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1305423832262115
The advancement of science and technology in societies in development makes born a diversity of interests whose satisfaction is to be subject to risk prevention and the restoration of damage caused eventually by mass production, environmental pollution, degradation of nature, public services deficit, and others who may to sacrifice the company's present and future generations. The Brazilian Constitution of 1988 guarantees rights and set duties, individuals and collectives, for the realization of the Democratic State of Law, establishing mechanisms and procedures for the judicialization of the collective conflicts and public civil action, governed by the law n.7.347/85 is one of legal instruments of access to Justice with the goal to ensure the protection of fundamental rights can be used by different entities, public and private. Being the Public Ministry the institution which has the power to represent the company and defend the legal order, to its must be ensured sufficient autonomy to pursue the public civil action as a legitimated common. On respect the civil associations representatives of groups and communities in the defense of fundamental rights must be waived the requirement of time defined of its constitution to enter into legal proceedings, as stipulated in Paragraph 4 of art. 5 of these law, because the restriction reduces the scope of the fundamental principle of access to justice. Moreover, should be ensured to the citizen the active title on the public civil action in defense of fundamental social rights, since which is the citizen the representative to demand protection for life worthy of all men.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A legitimidade da participação processual na tutela dos direitos difusos
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2007) GATO, Gisele Augusta Fontes; MAROJA, Ângela; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9078629034100575
The theoretical approach of the procedural participation is found at a point of intersection between a social-political theory and a legal theory, in order to achieve that it was necessary to initiate from Habermas social theory, proceeding to his political theory and only then to his legal theory. In terms of a discursive theory, the perfection of judicial sentences derives not only from the rationality of the legislation, but also from the reproduction, in the scope of the legal speech, of the conditions of the rational speech, bearing in mind the pragmatic limitations that occur on the legal speech, limitations that arise from the specifics of the legal speech whose main purpose is resolving decision making issues, cannot be developed under the same basis of the ethical speech. Even though the Legal speech is limited by the pragmatic impositions in it, the same way the practical speeches in general, the argument is necessary to the rational justification and the perfection of the sentence, and it is in this aspect that the legal speech connects with the participation, essential for the rational justification and legitimacy of the sentence. Thus, the procedural legislation must be submitted to critics in order to verify if the procedural participation prescribed in the legislation is capable of guaranteeing a legitimate procedure. In our national legislation two situations are not justifiable rationally. First, the one that refers to the current judicial procedure, based in the individual paradigm, insufficient for processing deals formulated based on diffuse rights for they hinder the necessary argument about the legal paradigms and adequate representation that will be presented at court. Second, the restriction to the individual participation in the majority of the procedural actions involving the protection of the diffuse rights, which cannot be rationally justified. Although there is an indicative of change consisting of a first draft of a code of collective process considering legitimate the participation of any member of society. This extension of legitimacy does not apply to all actions that can be used to tutor diffuse interests and rights; the constitutional control was not among the changes. Therefore the discussion over the subject of procedural participation cannot be closed, not even after the promulgation of the code of collective process, due to the importance of the participation of all the interested parties, or of its legitimate representatives, in any judicial procedure where its interests or rights are being questioned. Only by continuing the discussion around the insufficiencies of the judicial procedure in the liberal paradigm for protecting the diffuse rights will we be able to create a rational argument on the subject, whose conclusion represents the victory of the best reasons.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Parâmetros de aplicação da boa-fé objetiva no sistema processual civil brasileiro
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2013-02-07) LEVY, Karine de Aquino Câmara; COSTA, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5469957203750291
This study aims to examine the application of objective good faith under the Brazilian civil procedural law. To do so, demonstrate, primarily, that the observance of good faith in its objective feature is not restricted to civil diploma materials, especially form the objective good faith an ethical value basis in constitutional law, spreading therefore throughout the Brazilian legal system, including the legal relationships procedural. Moreover, it will verify that the objective good faith is expressed in the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure, which provides for duties of loyalty and cooperation among all subjects of the process, which, however, is not sufficient for its realization in the process, necessitating the application of preventive and repressive measures for its observance. In this vein, it is shown the important role of the Judiciary in conducting the process in order to adapt it to the peculiarities of the case, according to social morality, seeing mainly a fair decision. Thus, the context in which it develops good faith is the Neoprocessualism, where the process is seen as an instrument for achieving good faith, morality, honesty and loyalty, representing a symbiosis between the ethical values and legal principles in the pursuit of realizing the right material.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Precedentes no direito brasileiro: uma análise crítica sobre a utilização do “distinguishing” no Supremo Tribunal Federal
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2013) GARCIA, André Luis Bitar de Lima; COSTA, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5469957203750291
The paper discusses judicial precedents in the Brazilian reality, to contribute to a better understanding of the distinguishing through the analysis of cases the Federal Supreme Court. The Brazilian system needs the force of precedent, especially given our control of constitutionality, the presence of open procedural clauses and of content of the principle of equality. However, we emphasize that the implementation of stare decisis in Brazil will not occur automatically, either via legislative imposition. From the contrast of two general theories of precedent (as previous rule Frederick Schauer principle and precedent as Ronald Dworkin), we discuss two decisions of the Federal Supreme Court, in order to establish criteria for the use of the technique of distinguishing. In the research, the precedents are considered principles, with space for a possible distinction and for the protection of fundamental rights. The theory of law chosen to support the conclusions of the study wasth at of Ronald Dworkin.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Precedentes sob a perspectiva das teorias da argumentação jurídica de Neil MacCormick e Robert Alexy: da inteligibilidade dos deveres de coerência e integridade do Código de Processo Civil à análise de julgados do Supremo Tribunal Federal
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2018-01-25) GARCIA, Arthur Vinicius Berreza; COSTA, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5469957203750291
The work exhibits one precedents theory, based on the theoreticals of legal reasoning Neil MacCormick and Robert Alexy, with the objective of defending its application in the Brazilian legal order from the analysis of devices of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Supremo Tribunal Federal decisions. In the legal field, it is sustained the interpretation of devices to the use of precedents under the perspective of the proposed theory, highlighting the concepts of coherence and integrity. In the practical field, despite the existence of a different conception from the Supremo Tribunal Federal’s ministers about the use of precedents, the change of this vision is defended.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A tutela coletiva extraprocessual: o diálogo institucional como instrumento de atuação do ministério público para a concretização dos direitos sociais
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-08-14) SILVA, Sandoval Alves da; MAUÉS, Antonio Gomes Moreira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5100632338260364
The thesis argues for the progressive implementation of the human rights (gradualist reasoning) via institutional dialogue conducted by the public prosecution service that impacts directly on the „separation of powers” dogma through interaction between the branches of the government. To this end, it resorts to practical examples, theories and normative arguments. The thesis demonstrates the nature of the public prosecution service as a public power with constitutional autonomy and political-bureaucratic capability (democratic and moral legitimacy) to engage in procedural rounds to protect public interest and social demands aiming to fulfill the social rights via political accords that serve as a temporary last word about social conflicts. In order to carry out this task, the institution counts on procedural instruments such as notification, request, recommendation, accords of implementation, etc. Such instruments allow the institution to provoke, initiate, coordinate, conduct and carry out a dialog with the other branches of the government in order to reach a political accord that can fulfill the social rights. This action takes place when the state violates human rights either because it is involved in an excessive activity or because it is in a state of latency due to lack of the necessary specification of the social rights for extrajudicial enforceability and judicial enforceability. Thus, dialogue is integral in cases of default by either violation due to excess or omission of material benefits that are essential to cater for the human needs under the state responsibility in order to meet the immediate continuous and gradual obligation of providing definition, organization, proceduralization, specification and implementation of social rights to ultimately fulfill the distributive justice through the defense of the common, indivisible or collective goods and their individual appropriation scheme.