Programa de Pós-Graduação em Docência em Educação em Ciências e Matemáticas - PPGDOC/IEMCI
URI Permanente desta comunidadehttps://repositorio.ufpa.br/handle/2011/8498
O Programa de Pós-Graduação em Docência em Educação em Ciências e Matemáticas (PPGDOC) integra o Instituto de Educação Matemática e Científica (IEMCI) da Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA). O Curso diferencia-se da especialização (Pós-Graduação lato sensu) em áreas de ensino pelo aprofundamento do conhecimento de metodologias de pesquisa e de aprendizagem, efetivo processo de produção do conhecimento sobre e na ação docente, bem como pela obrigatoriedade de desenvolvimento de um produto de ensino.
Navegar
Navegando Programa de Pós-Graduação em Docência em Educação em Ciências e Matemáticas - PPGDOC/IEMCI por Assunto "Abordagem CTS"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Abordagem CTS no atendimento educacional especializado: práticas de ensino-aprendizagem em ciências para educandos (as) com deficiência intelectual(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2021-03-04) BARBOSA, Brena Santa Brígida; LEITÃO, Wanderléia Azevedo Medeiros; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9180849418936246; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-6630This is a qualitative investigation, in the participant research modality. It was developed at the Teacher Lourenço Filho Specialized Educational Assistance Center (pedagogical unit of the Pestalozzi Foundation of Pará), specifically in the Science workshop, with ten learners with intellectual disabilities. It is presents itself as a research question: in what aspects the use of sequences of activities on the theme – trash, according to the approach in Science, Technology and Society (STS) can contribute to the teaching-learning process and inclusion of learners with intellectual disabilities in Specialized Educational Assistance (SEA)? This proposal was developed with a socio-environmental project, which addressed the theme – trash, through studies on the landfill in the municipality of Marituba, with the objective of analyzing the teaching-learning process and inclusion of learners with intellectual disabilities in the context of SEA based on CTS relations, as well as investigating the potentialities and the limitations in the practices developed. The investigative instruments used: Individual Development Plan and Pedagogical Political Project; logbook; SEA plan notebook; audio and video recordings of the learners in the activities; audio recordings of the reports of the responsible and of the collaborators; individual and collective reports. It was decided to develop Laurence Bardin's Content Analysis, through the analysis of four empirical materials (individual activities, interview with a learner, collective poster and letter to the authorities), obtaining four sets of categories a posteriori. The results obtained showed that the sequences of activities developed significantly contributed to the teaching-learning process and the inclusion of learners with intellectual disabilities as some STS elements were present: dialogicity; contextualization; interdisciplinarity; active participation; collaborative learning; critical-reflexive thinking; autonomy and decision making, potentializing both the acquisition of knowledge, the use of skills and the development of values by the learners involved, as the resignification of the teaching practice itself and the attitudinal changes among the participating subjects. As a product, an e-book was prepared, aiming to collaborate with the pedagogical practice of educators who work at SEA, as well as to give didactic subsidies to educators who work in the science teaching in the common classroom, with learners with intellectual disabilities.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) A abordagem CTSA na matriz referência e em itens do ENEM: um olhar específico para a física(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2019-01-07) CASTRO, George Anderson Macedo; Brito, Licurgo Peixoto de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5100592138044970; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8363-8971Conducted in the context of a professional master's degree, this study aimed to analyze and discuss, from the perspective of the STS approach, Enem items and reference matrix skills related to Physics, assuming interdisciplinarity and contextualization as assumptions of the STS approach. The research presents as product a series of four videos produced for Youtube, whose scripts were elaborated with a group of teachers of Physics of the Basic Education, in the context of a continuous formation about the relation between the STS approach and the Enem. For analysis and discussion of the items and skills, seven editions of the exam between 2011 and 2017 were explored. This study considered the unidimensionality of the Enem items, the fact that each one of them proposes to specifically evaluate a skill. of the reference matrix, with the ability information evaluated by each item taken from the Enem microdata, released by Inep after each exam edition, thus establishing for the group of items analyzed a corresponding group of skills. Thus, taking a specific look at Physics, analyzing not only the items, but also the corresponding skills establishing the item / skill relationship, the research seeks to identify approximations between the STS approach and the Enem. The analysis methodology used was Laurence Bardin's Content Analysis, through which it was first identified in the item group those that presented approximations with the STS approach, proceeding in the same way with the skills related to the items in this group. The items and skills that from Content Analysis were related to the STS approach were organized into three categories: Perception Development (DP), Question Development (DQ) and Social Commitment Development (DCS), categories adapted from the Roseline Strieder's doctoral dissertation, which allowed us to understand how the elements analyzed approached the STS approach. Thus, when analyzing 105 items and the 18 skills related to these items, the results indicated that in only 11 items (10.5%) we approached the STS approach, which occurred for a group of 10 skills (55.5%). %). This allows us to infer that, although the STS approach is related to a large number of Enem Reference Matrix skills, it is not observed in a similar proportion to the items related to Physics content present in the exam. Thus, the study indicates that the items analyzed do not jointly privilege interdisciplinarity and contextualization as one might expect, since these two perspectives, according to the official documents, underlie the Enem.