Navegando por Assunto "Adorno, Theodor W. (Theodor Wiesengrund), 1903-1969"
Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Artigo de Periódico Acesso aberto (Open Access) O conceito de esclarecimento em Horkheimer, Adorno e Freud: apontamentos para um debate(2011-12) SOUZA, Maurício Rodrigues deThis article analyses the concept of enlightenment in Horkheimer, Adorno and Freud. Therefore, it traces a parallel between two of the most representative works of these authors in terms of cultural criticism: The Concept of Enlightenment and The Future of an Illusion, respectively. Although an initial approach might suggest different theoretical perspectives, we emphasize that they can be taken as complementary in defense of a more adequate using of conceptual thought.Artigo de Periódico Acesso aberto (Open Access) Deus e o Diabo nos detalhes: a ética em Buber e Adorno(2003) MENDONÇA, Kátia Marly LeiteThe author approaches Violence from a ''personalist and phenomenological'' perspective, so that the issue do not remain exclusevily referred to its usual sense, the violation of physical integrity. The article takes M. Buber and T. Adorno philosophies – both concerned with the construction of a ''phenomenology of sensibilities'' – as a support for its own elaboration, and compares their ethical implications, showing how a enlarged understanding of Violence rises from that point of view.Artigo de Periódico Acesso aberto (Open Access) Ética e estética da alteridade em Horkheimer, Adorno e Freud: comentários a partir de “elementos do anti-semitismo” e “o inquietante”(2014-08) SOUZA, Maurício Rodrigues de; BIRMAN, JoelAdopting as a starting point the reference made by Horkheimer and Adorno in Elements of Anti-Semitism: limits of enlightenment, to the text of Freud named The Uncanny, this work intends to establish some points of contact between them in the important field of studies dedicated to the phenomenon of prejudice. In these terms, it proposes an ethics and aesthetics of alterity that, privileging the dissonance of a strange familiarity, valorize negativeness instead of a positive philosophy whose lights can conduce to absolute totalitarian blindness. The aim here resides in the possibility that, when remitting to the fractures of men's contact to what he takes for real, this movement rescues a tragicity that resists to be appropriated by the longings of dominion and representative commodity adopted both by instrumental reason and by the speeches of intolerance to differences.
