Navegando por Assunto "Discricionariedade judicial"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Conceitos jurídicos indeterminados e o novo código de processo civil: normas de textura aberta e parâmetros da discricionariedade judicial(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-10-09) PINHEIRO NETO, Pedro Bentes; GÓES, Gisele Santos Fernandes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1305423832262115The paper discusses legal indeterminacy in the new civil procedure law, contributing towards a comprehension of the open standards texture. To do so, we will analyze neoprocessualism as a new methodology of studying civil procedure law. We used theoretical framework as positivist authors to disclose the meaning of the legal indeterminacy, reaching a practical technique to application in a case law. The research involves the study of application, interpretation and judicial discretion. By the end, some parameters for limited using of judicial discretion.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) O convencimento judicial e a valoração probatória(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2013) CROELHAS, Clívia Renata Loureiro; GÓES, Gisele Santos Fernandes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1305423832262115This dissertation aims to analyze how the judges work with respect evaluates evidence in the civil suit, precisely in regard to judicial conviction, and how this convictions are exposed in decisions motivation. In this way, preliminarily studied a bit about the institute of proof, and then arrive in a discussion about the change of paradigm caused by the influence of Fundamental Rights emanating from Federal Constitution 1988 in the Brasilian law, and so explain about the existents evaluates models of the proofs, and their ability to eliminate judicial discretion, forward the current complexity of the demands put on trial. Started to look for assistance in compared doctrine for institutes that can be transported to the usual national practice, and complement argumentation, and necessary motivation motivates so that the correct standard of proof could give rise to a conviction court properly motivated, which makes the ideal democratic state.