Navegando por Assunto "Dworkin, R. M., 1931-2013"

Agora exibindo 1 - 8 de 8

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
As ações afirmativas como instrumento de inclusão social: uma análise à luz da teoria da igualdade de recursos de Ronald Dworkin
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2012) VALENTE, Karla Rafaelli Ribeiro; BRITO FILHO, José Cláudio Monteiro de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7823839335142794
This study intends to discuss affirmative action as able instruments to promote the social inclusion of vulnerable groups, specifically black people. We try to justify the use of affirmative actions by the State from the perspective of distributive justice, from the conception of the theory of “equality of resources”, developed by c. To justify the use of these measures, we set from the Dworkin's liberal political theory, trying to analyze the values that comprise it, whice are: liberty, equality and community. Inside this discussion of the justification for affirmative action, we established that they should be guided by the criteria of justice, adequacy and efficiency, under penalty of being unconstitutional and innocuous. We understand that this discussion fits perfectly to the Brazilian reality, which is marked by profound social exclusion. Furthermore, any analysis of the substantive content of equality needs take place in the context of a “normative political theory”. That’s why we choose to study this question from Dworkin's theory, which is consistent with the precepts contained in CRFB/1988. After forming this fundamental basis, we start to analyze the case in Brazil, taking as a paradigm the policy adopted by UFPA through Resolution nº. 3.361/2005/CONSEP, investigating whether the measure adopts the minimum retro-mentioned criteria.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
O controle de constitucionalidade da pena desproporcional em busca da resposta certa
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-10-16) PICKERELL, Manuela Bitar Lelis dos Santos; GOMES, Marcus Alan de Melo; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0371519214729478
The research notes the need to accomplish in Brazil the judicial review of disproportionate penalty. If the stain pen is in jeopardy of conduct, the judge must acquit the defendant. However, if the stain remains at excessive quantum of sentence in the abstract, then the judge should disregard the sanctioning secondary rule applying to the case another penalty, withdrawal of paternal criminal legal system, which is proportional to the present situation. The Dworkin’s theory allows this judicial review to show that a decision leading to the principles of the law of the discussion forum devoted to democracy, and not vice versa. Moreover, the present law as an argumentative practice that aims to give the case the right answer, which will be achieved through a constructive interpretation of the moral principles of the community, Dworkin tie this election of the new sentence, away from the judicial decisionism. For the election of substitute penalty, the judge must find the settlor principle of incrimination, seeking it in another criminal type. This will be worth (right answer) to apply to the case.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Desacordos teóricos na filosofia do direito contemporânea: a influência da filosofia da linguagem no debate Hart-Dworkin e a tentativa de sua superação através da teoria dos planos de Scott Shapiro
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2018-02-08) RODRIGUES, Filipe Augusto Oliveira; MATOS, Saulo Monteiro Martinho de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1755999011402142
This work has as general objective to analyze the influence of philosophy of language on the Hart – Dworkin Debate and the overcoming tried by the planning theory of Scott Shapiro, focusing the theoretical disagreements. This objective is always sought by the mixture of two elements. In the first place, the exploration of the existing arguments in legal theory. Secondly, the relation of these arguments to those presented in fields of general philosophy. Our hypothesis is that the study of this debate and relationship show us that Dworkin's theory of disagreements is the best explanation of the problem, but at the same time the opposing theories chosen are using several methodological elements that represent advances that have been made in general philosophy, such as the perspective of the plans proposed by Michael Bratman. We attempt to demonstrate this hypothesis through the principal analysis of four authors and their influences, namely Ronald Dworkin, H.L.A. Hart, Jules Coleman, and Scott Shapiro. Through this analysis we hope to demonstrate how the foundations of the proposed theories have been changing the focus from philosophy of language to other fields and which is the state of legal theory with this advance. As result, we defend the point that the hypothesis is right and even without the best explanatory capacity, the new theories of law need to be better analyzed and their earnings better considered.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A equação igualdade-liberdade revisitada: John Rawls, Ronald Dworkin e Hannah Arendt
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2010-04-20) OLIVEIRA, André Silva de; VAZ, Celso Antônio Coelho; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0547983721448176
The present study aims to revisit the equality-freedom equation, especially in their concepts of John Rawls, Ronald Dworkin and Hannah Arendt, to indicate which of the two values owns normative value more transcendent. Having in mind this desideratum, this equation was analyzed from the current doctrinal of the liberalism of the present time confronting it with the political thought of Hannah Arendt, which increased the complexity of the research considering that both come from different philosophical and political traditions. Throughout this work, looked for demonstrate, mainly supported in political thought of Hannah Arendt, that the positive liberty, founded on the principle of self-government and in combination with the complex equality, can be pointed as the most transcendent value in the famous equation.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Lei Muwaji: dos discursos do enfrentamento aos diálogos do reconhecimento
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2013-06-28) SÁ JUNIOR, Adalberto Fernandes; VAZ, Celso Antônio Coelho; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0547983721448176
This dissertation analyses the constitutionality of the legal project nº 1.057/2007, mostly known as Muwaji Law, that deals with, according to its text, the struggle against indigenous peoples’ traditional customs that are “harmful” to the human rights of children. We concluded that this project is unconstitutional for disrespecting the self-determination right of these peoples. First, it undermines the equality principle, the right to non-discrimination and the mutual recognition convention. The indigenous minorities are treated in a discriminatory manner. Secondly, the fairness principle, the self-government right and the convention of consent are not respected. Indigenous peoples did not participate in due processes of political deliberation. Finally, the integrity principle, the right to cultural integrity and the convention of continuity are not taken into account. The Amerindian perspectives on childhood are not respected. As a method, we use the theory of law as integrity by Ronald Dworkin.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Liberdade de expressão: a concepção integrada de Dworkin
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-08-07) LIMA, Sávio Barreto Lacerda; BRITO FILHO, José Cláudio Monteiro de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7823839335142794
To achieve the desired purpose of presenting Integrated right conception of freedom of expression in this research, the jus philosophical thought of Ronald Dworkin will be the starting point and main theoretical framework around the theme here exposed, given its understanding that ethics, morality, politics and law are integrated each other and propositions about the meaning of a value, a political ideal or a right should also support the other. Furthermore, it argues, still in favor of the possibility of assigning the status of objective truth to moral judgments - interpretative concepts in which the truth is revealed through the best argument which consensus is not guaranteed. In the study of freedom as political value developed in sequence, a brief historical overview of the evolution of the concept of freedom, important to show that, historically, freedom is understood as a fragmented value, highlighting in particular the thought of Benjamin Constant and Isaiah Berlin, philosophers of the modern era who wrote the most popular conceptions of freedom today. Also discuss an uncomfortable consequence of the fragmented conception of freedom, which places it in conflict with other important values such as it. Pursuing a conception of freedom based on the idea of the unity of value, grounded in Dworkin Moral Theory, which points to the need to justify the freedom by valid arguments also for other values will result in a conception of liberty sensitive to the meaning of other values, such as equality, with which they must reconcile rather than conflict. Subsequently, an approach to freedom as a right, dealing with the relationship between law and morality, and showing an understanding of human rights to demonstrate its alignment with the theory defended here. Will be sustained also the impossibility of speaking of a general right to freedom, concluding, as a result, it has, in fact, the right to various freedoms. And finally, it brings on the specific research point, the right to freedom of expression, expounding upon the understanding of the majority doctrine of that right as a fragmented value, to defend an integrated approach with other values and rights, by understanding that the right to freedom of expression, understood this way, reveals its true resource character to be distributed according to the distributive justice criteria. The best way to assimilate this right is by the integrity of the values held through the moral reading. To invigorate the arguments, the analysis of a case — HC 82 424 — which aroused great legal debate on the right to freedom of expression. The thesis is in favor of freedom of expression that reinforces what you think about other rights and to be strengthened by them.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Para além do garantismo: uma proposta hermenêutica de controle da decisão penal
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2011) PINHO, Ana Cláudia Bastos de; MAUÉS, Antonio Gomes Moreira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5100632338260364
Assuming that, in Brazil, the theory of criminal justice is not consistent, the present work argues that the epistemology of juridical garantism, held by Luigi Ferrajoli, has limitations that separate it from the practical world, and therefore hinder the development of a theory able to limit the power of the criminal judge. Although the theory of guarantism gives special attention to the interpretive relativism, by proposing a technique of language's formalization to reduce situations of uncertainty, it still admits an insuppressible margin of discretion (always pro reo). The purpose of this thesis is the overcoming of this semantic model of perception of Law by a hermeneutic understanding of the juridical phenomenon. Based on the philosophical hermeneutics (Hans-Georg Gadamer) and the theory of Law as integrity (Ronald Dworkin), this research endorses the hypothesis that the Law is not the result of findings (conventionalism), neither of inventions (pragmatism). In other words, Law is not written somewhere in the past, neither is what the judges think it is. The Law is an interpretive social practice, it is the result of the best possible moral argument. By articulating relevant concepts of Gadamer (such as prior foundations of the understanding, merging of horizons, tradition, dialogue, experience, finitude and language) with the analysis of juridical integrity of Dworkin, this research - without the pretension of correcting Ferrajoli‟s garantism, but to overcome the eventual limitations of a semantic theory of Law - presents the hermeneutics as a privileged path to constrain the criminal decision.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Precedentes no direito brasileiro: uma análise crítica sobre a utilização do “distinguishing” no Supremo Tribunal Federal
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2013) GARCIA, André Luis Bitar de Lima; COSTA, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5469957203750291
The paper discusses judicial precedents in the Brazilian reality, to contribute to a better understanding of the distinguishing through the analysis of cases the Federal Supreme Court. The Brazilian system needs the force of precedent, especially given our control of constitutionality, the presence of open procedural clauses and of content of the principle of equality. However, we emphasize that the implementation of stare decisis in Brazil will not occur automatically, either via legislative imposition. From the contrast of two general theories of precedent (as previous rule Frederick Schauer principle and precedent as Ronald Dworkin), we discuss two decisions of the Federal Supreme Court, in order to establish criteria for the use of the technique of distinguishing. In the research, the precedents are considered principles, with space for a possible distinction and for the protection of fundamental rights. The theory of law chosen to support the conclusions of the study wasth at of Ronald Dworkin.