Navegando por Assunto "Emmanuel Lévinas"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A preocupação com uma ética da alteridade na relação educador/educando
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-06) ALMEIDA, Neimar de
This paperisstructured, above all, from the Ethics of Otherness comparison with theoretical assumption from the LithuanianFrench philosopher Emmanuel Levinas, with the educational reality, when it comes to teacher / student relationship. In pursuit of this approach between ethics of otherness and education is proposed to identify the concern with the "other" on the part of educators in the educational environment. The objectives were to present the Ethics of Otherness according to the author mentioned and check with the subject of education a high school DF, if there is concern that ethic on the part of educators of this Learning Center. The methodology used was a "case study" through an oral survey of educators and debate, through questioning, with students. From the research, the work will show that there is this concern from educators. This conclusion was based on dialogue with educators, but especially as the reporting of the students involved. The intention is in addition to verify this proximity between ethics of otherness and education, demonstrate the importance and the impact of that thought in human development and learning of students.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Testemunho e responsabilidade: o dizer de Semprún sob a ética de Lévinas
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2019-02) FIGUEIREDO, Elielson de Souza; SARMENTO-PANTOJA, Tânia Maria Pereira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3707451019100958
This doctoral thesis concentrates efforts to bring philosophical thinking closer to Emmanuel Lévinas (Kaunas, Lithuania, 1906) of the theoretical categories of analysis of the Witness Literature produced from the surviving Shoah. With order to prove that the philosophy of otherness of Lévinas offers a valuable theoretical set for the studies about the Testimony as a point of intersection between Memory, Fiction and History, the thesis focuses in the autofictional writing of Jorge Semprún (Madrid, Spain, 1923), particularly about the novels A grande Viagem and A escrita ou a vida.The central argument defended here states that the self-production produced by Semprún can be understood in the conceptual key of what Lévinas calls Responsibility, that is, as the survivor's response to the unjustified suffering under which millions of people imprisoned and murdered in the camps suffered and died forced labor and extermination, maintained during the German nazi regime. Starting from the hypothesis that testimony is to assume the ethical task of resisting the banalization of murder, the thesis investigates a small conceptual group that, along the philosophical thought of Lévinas, is linked to responsibility: election, convocation, face, passivity and ethical subjectivity form the basis of argument defended here. Through alternate quotes and comments that allow us to read the criticism with the Testimony through the reflections of Lévinas, besides allowing us to read the philosophy of otherness through the words of figures like Seligmann-Silva, Gagnebin, Agamben, Rosani Umbach and Tania Sarmento - Pantoja, this thesis intends to create an important theoretical discussion for this same critic of this philosophy. About Jorge Semprún, his work of autofiction is read here in the theoretical key of Tell and taken as an ethical gesture of desubjectivation insofar as in re-elaborating his experiences in the forced labor camp of Buchenwald, where he was a political prisoner between 1943 and 1945, the writer uses the artifice to fictionally recreate facts and characters of his survival during the prison, in order to produce an ambiguity between history, autobiography and fiction. Thus, supported by theoreticians such as Philippe Lejeune, Ángel Loureiro, Leonor Arfuch and Manuel Alberca, this thesis demonstrates how Semprun's autofiction intends the possibilities of language exposing the conscience or ethical subjectivity of the survivor who, even in the face of the limits imposed on the task of Tell the excess of traumatic events, does not shy away from exposing the insufficiency of his writing and thus attends to the Responsibility of the convocation to witness.