Navegando por Assunto "Episteme"
Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) O Código florestal e a perspectiva amazônica: transformações paradigmáticas desde o agro do negócio para o agro da ecologia(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2020-12-21) MARTINS, Evilhane Jum; MOREIRA, Eliane Cristina Pinto; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7471628624621314This thesis aims to analyze the Amazonian agroecological epistemology as an instrument to the re-reading of the Forest Code through an investigation thatstarts from the developmentalist logic of the agribusiness to the Amazonian agroecological perspective. For that purpose, the research is based on the following problem: what are the limits and possibilities for the production of counter-hegemonic interpretive views about the Forest Code from the Amazonian agroecology as an episteme? In order to answer the research problem, the methodology employed obeys the trinomial: Base Theory/Approach, Procedure, and Technique. AsBase Theory and Approach this research has an epistemological matrix conducted by the systemic complex perspective, which is based on authors with a multidisciplinary view through the connection of areas of knowledgesuch as Political Ecology, Environmental Geopolitics, Sociology, and Environmental Law. The Procedureused is initially supported by the historical method,which in the present case will conduct the studies on the evolution of Forest Code in Brazil, as well as the monographic method. The Technique to beused will be projected in four interconnected moments, which will consist of the preparation of reviews, extended abstracts, data analysis and annotated bibliographies. Regarding the results, it is shown that the Amazonian agroecology as episteme is not onlya possibility, but is effectively a subvention to a paradigmatic transformation from the interpretive outlooks of complex, multidimensional, and counter-hegemonic matrix, about the Forest Code.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) A crise do conceito de Episteme(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2004-01) OLIVEIRA, Damião BezerraItem Acesso aberto (Open Access) Senso comum e Ciência em popper(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2020-11-25) SILVA, Adam Augusto Silva e; DIAS, Elizabeth de Assis; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9610357600630781; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-6313This The aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between common sense and science in Popper's thought. The problem of our research is presented when Popper denies the ideal of episteme when defining science by its negative character, falseability. That is, his idea that science is fallible knowledge and liable to error clashes with those defended by the epistemological tradition that conceives it as a well-foundedcertain and demonstrated knowledge. Thus, by denying positive characteristics, traditionally recognized as typical of science, Popper's position raises the following question: What status does he reserves to science, since he does not identify it with episteme? In other words, by denying the ideal of episteme, would Popper be reducing science to doxa or common sense? This research will be guided by the hypothesis that Popper is far from reducing science to doxa or common sense, because, although he sees certain proximities between them, he also recognizes that science goes beyond common sense. Thus, in order to highlight Popper's position in the face of the problem outlined, we intend, first, to analyze how the relations between common sense and science have been treated by philosophers since antiquity, such as Plato and Aristotle and, also, more contemporaneously, by Bachelard. Later, we intend to show that, contrary to these philosophers who see doxa and episteme, or common sense and science as distinct forms of knowledge, Popper establishes very close relations between both, but does not reduce science to the level of common sense, to the extent that he conceives it as enlightened common sense.