Navegando por Assunto "Governo estadual"

Agora exibindo 1 - 5 de 5

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Formação e renovação dos governos do Pará: elite governamental e grupos políticos (1983-2006)
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2012-09) SOUZA, Márcio Ivan Lopes Ponte de; FARIAS FILHO, Milton Cordeiro; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0624491756992741
This study aimed to identify who are the central Government Elites who composed the Governments of Pará between 1983 and 2006 from the analysis methodology proposed by the Theory of Elites. Our object of study documents titled Terms Posse, filed with the State Department of Administration (SEAD), which record the appointments of Secretary of State offices and the like. Using the method of Institutional Position has detected a Political Group formed from the composition of each Government investigated and, of this group, are selected names that were included in other Governments, called “elite lasting”. Each member of this latter group corresponds to a Connection which can be from two, three, four or more administrations. Analyzing these data in light of elitism, produced a “Elitization Index” (IE), which compares how much each Government produced, percentage of names that formed the “elite lasting”.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Governos de gabinete e coalizões cíclicas no ultrapresidencialismo estadual: a experiência no Amazonas
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2010-03-30) LEITE, Breno Rodrigo de Messias; CORRÊA, Roberto Ribeiro; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0624569499031826
SUBJECT – The purpose of my research is to analyze the mechanisms that structure the cabinet governments and the cyclic coalitions in Amazonas state-level ultrapresidentialism. In other words I have on focus explaining the governor‟s logic of success, of his legislative coalition, and of his cabinet in the constitution of a superdominance web in electoral, parliamentary, and executive arenas. PERIOD – In this case study I analyze four administrations by three Amazonas‟ governors: Gilberto Mestrinho (1991-1994), Amazonino Mendes (1995-1998 e 1999-2002) e Eduardo Braga (2003-2006), and four Legislative Assembly legislatures. THEORY – As theoretical orientation I use the contribution of public choice theory and the institutional analysis. I begin by the premise that the governor plays attempting maximize his rent-utility function within a certain institutional structure (covered by the gubernatorial coattails logic) that incentive the cooperative and length strategic interaction among the main players (governors, state deputies, ministers, and citizen-voters) in multiple decision arenas. METHODOLOGY – Firstly I use the Experimental Studies Laboratory (LEEX) data archives to set up a map of the electoral, party, and parliamentary dynamics. Then I work with Legislative Assembly of Amazonas (ALEAM) data archives to check the legislative production organization (successful ordinary law projects), and the governor‟s party-parliamentary coalition strength. Finally I handle my own data archive on the ministerial circulation, and consequently I apply and calculate the coalescence rate to estimate the proportionality levels of ultrapresidential cabinet governments. CONCLUSION AND OUTCOMES – The governors mount up the monopoly of Executive power agenda and ones control with a lot of efficiency the Legislative agenda. Moreover they share out the patronage resources as selective incentives to their allies in the multiple arenas games. As consequence I conclude that the majority in the state-level ultrapresidentialism is done, on the one hand, by appearing of cyclic coalitions with large party support in legislative arena; and, on the other, by building cabinet governments with zigzag participation of legislators, partisans, and specialists.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
O planejamento territorial participativo do Pará e o processo de formulação, implementação e tomada de decisões de políticas públicas: inovação e limites para a democracia participativa
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2012-10-19) MESQUITA, Thiago Broni de; SILVA, Dolores Lima da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7277148176512169
By taking the state government of Pará in 2007, the then Governor Ana Julia Carepa (PT) presents the Participative Territorial Planning which was an instrument through which the Government of the State of Pará aimed to ensure popular participation and decentralization of management, through steps where the population was consulted on issues and public policy proposals advocated local or regional. These proposals were incorporated into the statutory planning instruments (PPA, LDO, LOA) for the government to implement over the 04 years of management. The process involved the participation of more than 80,000 people across the state and elected councilors to compose 3983 12 Regional Councils of Popular Participation and more Counselors State 105 to compose the State Board of Public Participation. However, the project worked on actors with veto power within the executive branch, who ultimately decided not to implement public policy through the PTP, due to interests and infighting in the government. Thus this thesis aims to analyze the factors that have prevented the action of the PTP, making the process ineffective during the years 2007 and 2010.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Posseiros e invasores: propriedade e luta pela terra em Goiás durante o governo Mauro Borges Teixeira (1961-1964)
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2016-04) ESTEVE, Carlos Leandro da Silva
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A relação executivo-legislativo no projeto de criação da Superintendência do Planejamento Territorial Participativo (SPTP) no Estado do Pará
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2012) ROCHA, Dalton Davis Favacho da; SILVA, Maria Dolores Lima da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7277148176512169
This study addressed the Executive-Legislative relations in Pará through Bill 01/2008 implantaria that the Superintendency of Participative Territorial Planning (SPTP), during the 16th Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Pará in the period 2007-2010. Prepared by the State Government, the project included the establishment of an institution that would coordinate the process of popular participation and social control proposed by the government Ana Júlia Carepa early in his administration. How problematic, the study addressed the rejection by parliament to that project, whose research question was: what factors contributed to the rejection of the project of creating the SPTP by the Legislature? Moreover, what it means in Executive-Legislative relations according to the current literature. The hypotheses would be inferred that the rejection was motivated by the conflicting relationship between the Executive and Legislature in the parliamentary arena or the perception of conflict of interest of local political actors as to the boundaries of performance between political institutions and participatory representative political institutions. Members opposed to the project did not consider SPTP while effective practice democratic management, but suspected the same, for example, could be linked to strategies by the Executive for electoral purposes or bargaining before the Legislature. The development of the research has focused on the search for answers to issues presented and to verify the validity of the hypothesis inferred. As for the goal we evaluated the behavior of MPs in the course of the project to create the SPTP. As research tools were used and empirical literature searches.