Logo do repositório
Tudo no RIUFPA
Documentos
Contato
Sobre
Ajuda
  • Português do Brasil
  • English
  • Español
  • Français
Entrar
Novo usuário? Clique aqui para cadastrar. Esqueceu sua senha?
  1. Início
  2. Pesquisar por Assunto

Navegando por Assunto "Law content"

Filtrar resultados informando as primeiras letras
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Resultados por página
  • Opções de Ordenação
  • Carregando...
    Imagem de Miniatura
    ItemAcesso aberto (Open Access)
    O Conteúdo do direito à liberdade de expressão na jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal
    (Universidade Federal do Pará, 2021-08-17) BACELAR, Rafaela Gonçalves; MAGALHÃES, Breno Baía; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0126393188779750; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7183-2440
    This dissertation aims to identify the content of the right to freedom of expression developed by the jurisprudence of the Brazilian Supreme Court, seeking to analyze, from the inductive method and the jurisprudence research of, its foundations, justifications, and limits to its exercise. Therefore, the research was divided into three chapters. In the first, we analyze the Supreme Court judgments on the right in question, which were grouped according to discourse categories, identifying the argumentative parameters adopted by its ministers and the judgment trends. In the second chapter, we point out the theoretical discussions that permeate freedom of expression, in order to verify its relationship with what has been developed in jurisprudence and, therefore, to identify the content of the law. From these premises, we identified a central argumentative frame of the Court, however, endowed with an abstract and generic character, allowing the existence of decisions with divergences between the ministers. Finally, in the last chapter, we analyze the existence of external and internal factors that can influence the decision making posture of the Supreme Court and, thereby, the jurisprudential construction on freedom of expression, indicating other investigative fields to complement the hypotheses found. In conclusion, we emphasize that, despite a central argumentative framework, there is interpretive flexibility in its decisions, allowing subsequent court cases to be resolved based on criteria different from their precedents, being possible the influence of other factors in the decisionmaking.
Logo do RepositórioLogo do Repositório
Nossas Redes:

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Configurações de Cookies
  • Política de Privacidade
  • Termos de Uso
  • Entre em Contato
Brasão UFPA