Navegando por Assunto "Magmatismo arqueano"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2

Desconhecido
Geocronologia Pb-Pb por evaporação em monocristal de zircão do magmatismo da região de Tucumã, SE do estado do Pará, Amazônia Oriental
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 1996-10-16) AVELAR, Valter Gama de; LAFON, Jean Michel; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4507815620234645
The region of Tucumã, in the southeast of the State of Pará (Eastern Amazon-Brazil), constitutes a continuity to the southwest of the Mineral Province of Carajás-PMC. The Archean compartmentalization of this region is represented by a preserved granite-greenstone terrain (TGG), including Archean granitoids (Granodiorite Rio Maria) and supracrustal sequences (Tucumã Group), and by the Itacaiúnas Shear Belt (CCI) that includes granodiorite and tonalitics (Xingu Complex), granulites (Pium Complex), and stratoid granitoids (Plaquê Suite). In the Proterozoic, the region is marked by the intrusion of several anorogenic bodies (Seringa and Velho Guilherme Granites), which cut through all Archean units. The geochronological results, presented here for Archean and Proterozoic rocks from the Tucumã region, were obtained through the Pb/Pb method by evaporation in zircon microcrystals separated from saprolite and fresh rocks. The zircons from a granodiorite orthogneiss from the Xingu Complex provided a Pb/Pb age of 2972 ± 16 Ma (2σ), while the zircons from the Granodiorite Rio Maria presented an age of 2850 ± 17 Ma (2σ). The zircons of the Plaque Suite Stratoid Granitoid defined a Pb/Pb age of 2729 ± 29 Ma (2σ). Among the anorogenic granite bodies, only the zircons from the Granite Seringa allowed the determination of Pb/Pb defined around 1893 ± 15 Ma (2σ). The zircons of Granito Velho Guilherme did not reveal sufficient amounts of Pb to allow the calculation of the age of this rock. The Pb/Pb ages by evaporation obtained in this work are similar to the ages given by the U/Pb method in zircons of correlated rocks in the PMC, particularly in the Rio Maria region, and are interpreted in terms of crystallization ages. The age obtained for the Plaque Suite Stratoid Granitoid rock (2972 ± 29 Ma) should be understood as a minimum age for crystallization of this rock, given the absence of other U/Pb geochronological information in this type of rocks throughout the PMC. The Rb/Sr ages between 2.57 Ga and 2.74 Ga, previously obtained respectively for the gneiss rocks (Xingu Complex) and for the Archean granites of the TGG, as well as the Rb/Sr age of 1.75 Ga obtained for the Granite Syringe, should be considered as rejuvenated ages. The geochronological data presented here indicate the existence of at least 4 distinct magmatic events for the Tucumã region, confirming that this portion of the PMC had a similar evolution to the granite-greenstone terrains of the Rio Maria region, where the same events were recognized. The Pb/Pb age by evaporation obtained for the granodiorite orthogneiss of the Xingu Complex at 2972 ± 16 Ma, represents the oldest data found so far for the arquane rocks of Tucumã. The Pb/Pb age around 2850 ± 17 Ma of the Rio Maria Granodiorite confirms the age of the TTG magmatism associated with the greenstone-belts occurring at about 2.85-2.87 Ga, in the south-central portion of the PMC. The 2729 ± 29 Ma age of the Plaque Suite Stratoid Granitoid provides an age for the structuring of the Itacaiúnas shear belt. The age of 1893 ± 15 Ma obtained for the Seringa Granite confirms that the formation of anorogenic granites in the PMC occurred in a short period of time during the Lower Proterozoic (1.87-1.89 Ga). The similarities of the 207Pb/206Pb ages provided by the zircons of saprolitic material and fresh rock from the same rocks demonstrated the effectiveness of the use of saprolite for the geochronological study of Pb/Pb in zircons. Finally, the Pb/Pb ages in zircons of Archean and Proterozoic rocks from the Tucumã region obtained in this work demonstrate the potential of the method for determining the age of crystallization of ancient rocks in the Amazon region.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Geoquímica e Geocronologia U-Pb-Hf do Magmatismo Meso- Neoarqueano da Borda Norte do Bloco Amapá, Sudeste do Escudo das Guianas
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2021-12-06) GONÇALVES, Renato Cantão; LAFON, Jean Michel; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4507815620234645
The southeastern portion of the Guiana Shield (SEG), in the northern region of the Amazonian Craton, is defined as a broad Paleoproterozoic orogenic belt added to an Archean block strongly reworked during the Transamazonian Cycle (2.26–1.95 Ga). This Archean block in the central portion of the state of Amapá, called the Amapá Block, is made up of a mesoneoarchean granulite-gneiss-migmatite association (~2.85 Ga and ~2.70-2.60 Ga) and by Rhyacian granitoids and metavolcanosedimentary sequences. The Amapá Block is delimited to the south and north by the Carecuru and Lourenço Rhyacian domains with Archean crustal relics. The Lourenço Domain is formed by Rhyacian granitoids, gneisses and metavolcanosedimentary sequences formed in magmatic arcs (2.20-2.12 Ga), followed by syncollisional to late orogenic magmatism (~2.11-2.07 Ga) and late granulitic metamorphism (~2.06-2.04 Ga). On the boundary between the Amapá Block and Lourenço Domain, Mesoarchean units (Gnaisse Porfírio - 3.19 Ga and Complexo Tumucumaque - 2.85 Ga) and Neoarchean units (Complex Guianense - ~2.65 Ga and Metagranitoid Pedra do Meio - 2.59 Ga) occur. Near Vila Bom Jesus village, (municipality of Tartarugalzinho - AP), at the transition between Archean and Rhyacian domains, orthogneisses and metagranitoids were dated by the U-Pb method in zircon by ICP-MS mass spectrometry and laser ablation (LA-ICP- MS) to investigate the geographic extension of the Porfírio Gneiss and Pedra do Meio Metagranitoid. Additionally, petrographic data, geochemical analyzes in whole rock and Lu-Hf isotopic geochemistry in zircon by LA-ICP-MS were used, together with previous data from orthogneisses and granitoids of the northern portion of the Amapá Block, to investigate the geodynamic context of formation of these granitoids and the episodes of generation and reworking of the continental crust during the Archean in this portion of the SEG. U-Pb dating of a biotite granodiorite orthogneiss provided a 207Pb/206Pb crystallization age of 2846 ± 36 Ma (MSWD = 1.3) for the orthogneiss magmatic precursor, indicating a Mesoarchean magmatic episode. Three samples of orthogneiss and metagranitoids provided 207Pb/206Pb crystallization ages of 2654 ± 12 Ma (MSWD = 1.4), 2618 ± 31 Ma (MSWD = 1.15) and 2618 ± 22 Ma (MSWD = 0.71) respectively, indicating a protracted Neoarchean magmatic episode. The U-Pb dating of a biotite granodiorite orthogneiss with crystallization age 207Pb/206Pb of 2096 ± 24 Ma (MSWD = 0.75) indicates the presence of imbricated Paleoproterozoic rocks in the Archean units of the investigated sector. These results lead to reconsider the configuration of the Archean units on the north edge of the Amapá Block. The Porfírio Gneiss and the Tumucumaque Complex must constitute only enclaves or xenoliths of the Mesoarchean basement in Neoarchean orthogneisses and granitoids. The Pedra do Meio Metagranitoid represents intrusive charnockitic plutons in the Guianense Complex, which is the dominant unit in the investigated sector. The geochemical data showed that the Mesoarchean samples have signature of biotite granites of crustal derivation. Neoarchean magmatism is also dominated by crustalderived biotite granites, but also includes granitoids with sanukitoids and high-pressure TTG affinities, in addition to hybrid granites. The geochemical signatures of biotite granites, the subchondrite values of ƐHf(t) (-11.3 < ƐHf(t) < -0.4) with Hf-TDM model ages between 3.9 and 3.2 Ga, and the presence of inherited zircons in most Neoarchean samples, with Mesoarchean (3.0, 2.89, 2.84 Ga) and Neoarchean (2.77, 2.74, 2.72 Ga) ages, indicate that this protracted Neoarchean magmatic episode reworked older units from the basement of the Amapá Block (Meso-Paleoarchean), in a collisional context with no evidence of crustal growth during the Neoarchean. However, it is still open which continental masses collided to form this portion of the Amapá Block, considering that the other Archean domains of the Amazonian (Carajás Province; Imataca Complex) and West African (Leo-Man Domain; Reguibat Shield) present a different geological history from the Amapá Block during the Neoarchean.