Navegando por Assunto "Processo civil"

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
O convencimento judicial e a valoração probatória
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2013) CROELHAS, Clívia Renata Loureiro; GÓES, Gisele Santos Fernandes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1305423832262115
This dissertation aims to analyze how the judges work with respect evaluates evidence in the civil suit, precisely in regard to judicial conviction, and how this convictions are exposed in decisions motivation. In this way, preliminarily studied a bit about the institute of proof, and then arrive in a discussion about the change of paradigm caused by the influence of Fundamental Rights emanating from Federal Constitution 1988 in the Brasilian law, and so explain about the existents evaluates models of the proofs, and their ability to eliminate judicial discretion, forward the current complexity of the demands put on trial. Started to look for assistance in compared doctrine for institutes that can be transported to the usual national practice, and complement argumentation, and necessary motivation motivates so that the correct standard of proof could give rise to a conviction court properly motivated, which makes the ideal democratic state.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A legitimidade da participação processual na tutela dos direitos difusos
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2007) GATO, Gisele Augusta Fontes; MAROJA, Ângela; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9078629034100575
The theoretical approach of the procedural participation is found at a point of intersection between a social-political theory and a legal theory, in order to achieve that it was necessary to initiate from Habermas social theory, proceeding to his political theory and only then to his legal theory. In terms of a discursive theory, the perfection of judicial sentences derives not only from the rationality of the legislation, but also from the reproduction, in the scope of the legal speech, of the conditions of the rational speech, bearing in mind the pragmatic limitations that occur on the legal speech, limitations that arise from the specifics of the legal speech whose main purpose is resolving decision making issues, cannot be developed under the same basis of the ethical speech. Even though the Legal speech is limited by the pragmatic impositions in it, the same way the practical speeches in general, the argument is necessary to the rational justification and the perfection of the sentence, and it is in this aspect that the legal speech connects with the participation, essential for the rational justification and legitimacy of the sentence. Thus, the procedural legislation must be submitted to critics in order to verify if the procedural participation prescribed in the legislation is capable of guaranteeing a legitimate procedure. In our national legislation two situations are not justifiable rationally. First, the one that refers to the current judicial procedure, based in the individual paradigm, insufficient for processing deals formulated based on diffuse rights for they hinder the necessary argument about the legal paradigms and adequate representation that will be presented at court. Second, the restriction to the individual participation in the majority of the procedural actions involving the protection of the diffuse rights, which cannot be rationally justified. Although there is an indicative of change consisting of a first draft of a code of collective process considering legitimate the participation of any member of society. This extension of legitimacy does not apply to all actions that can be used to tutor diffuse interests and rights; the constitutional control was not among the changes. Therefore the discussion over the subject of procedural participation cannot be closed, not even after the promulgation of the code of collective process, due to the importance of the participation of all the interested parties, or of its legitimate representatives, in any judicial procedure where its interests or rights are being questioned. Only by continuing the discussion around the insufficiencies of the judicial procedure in the liberal paradigm for protecting the diffuse rights will we be able to create a rational argument on the subject, whose conclusion represents the victory of the best reasons.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Parâmetros de aplicação da boa-fé objetiva no sistema processual civil brasileiro
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2013-02-07) LEVY, Karine de Aquino Câmara; COSTA, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5469957203750291
This study aims to examine the application of objective good faith under the Brazilian civil procedural law. To do so, demonstrate, primarily, that the observance of good faith in its objective feature is not restricted to civil diploma materials, especially form the objective good faith an ethical value basis in constitutional law, spreading therefore throughout the Brazilian legal system, including the legal relationships procedural. Moreover, it will verify that the objective good faith is expressed in the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure, which provides for duties of loyalty and cooperation among all subjects of the process, which, however, is not sufficient for its realization in the process, necessitating the application of preventive and repressive measures for its observance. In this vein, it is shown the important role of the Judiciary in conducting the process in order to adapt it to the peculiarities of the case, according to social morality, seeing mainly a fair decision. Thus, the context in which it develops good faith is the Neoprocessualism, where the process is seen as an instrument for achieving good faith, morality, honesty and loyalty, representing a symbiosis between the ethical values and legal principles in the pursuit of realizing the right material.