Navegando por Assunto "Senado"

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Partidos políticos, relação executivo-legislativo e a produção legislativa da comissão de constituição, justiça e cidadania do Senado Federal de 2003 a 2018
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2024-07-24) CARVALHO, Rodrigo Cordeiro; RUBIATTI, Bruno de Castro; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3593569714396077; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3167-4804
Considering the legislative studies agenda on the Brazilian Federal Senate, due to its role in the decision-making process, and the contribution of this agenda to discover the characteristics of the functioning of parliamentary committees, this research is based on the following problem. Did the parties coordinate the Executive-Legislative relationship in the legislative production of the Senate's Committee on Constitution, Justice, and Citizenship (CCJ) from 2003 to 2018? From this, the objectives are: to verify if there is a positive relationship between senators' previous political experience and their chances of occupying the CCJ; to observe if the party of the committee's president tends to appoint rapporteurs from its own party; to examine if there is a positive relationship between the occupation of the CCJ by the government coalition and the number of executive projects reported by this group each year; to check if there is a positive relationship between the degree of ideological heterogeneity of the government coalition and the frequency of using the terminative power in the CCJ. To do so, it was first discovered who occupied the CCJ and by which parties at the beginning and end of each legislative session through the Annual Reports of the Presidency (from 2003 to 2018); then, based on the biographies of the parliamentarians, data related to prior expertise (political career [number of mandates of the parliamentarian when occupying the CCJ and previous passage through elective positions in the Executive or Legislative branches], level of education, and profession) of these occupants were observed; finally, based on the results of the CCJ's deliberative meetings, information on authorship, rapporteurship, and opinions of each legislative proposition was collected - this stage, when necessary, was complemented by biographical research about federal deputies (in order to discover their respective party affiliations at the moments of voting on the matters, when the authorship was by a deputy). All the necessary documents and information to fulfill the described steps are available on the websites of the Federal Senate and the Chamber of Deputies. The data treatment was done using Excel spreadsheets, resulting in tables and graphs on the CCJ's occupation and legislative production throughout the established time frame. It is concluded that: the CCJ is mostly occupied by coalition government parties, but it presents equal chances of being chaired by both this group and the opposition, with the overall occupation characterized by senators in their first term in the Senate and with previous passages through both the Executive and Legislative branches, who remain in the committee for just over four years, have higher education, and are lawyers or professors, aged between 50 and 69 years, representing the male gender; the parties in the committee's presidency appoint more rapporteurs from their own parties, with a dominance of the coalition, both in rapporteurship and in proposition, and it also dominates the rapporteurship of executive initiatives; the results indicated by the rapporteurs are mostly for approval without changes (39.2%), but are closely followed by approval with alterations (amendment/substitute, 36.7%), and the voting on these opinions results in approval in 98.6% of cases, mostly with the non-terminative decision type (64.1%), while the percentage of terminative decisions seems negatively related to the degree of ideological heterogeneity of the coalition.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Produção legislativa sobre mulheres no Senado Federal (2015 a 2022)
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2024-12-20) ALVES, Camila Lobo da Gama; SOUSA, Rayza Sarmento de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2829775863179545; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-7941
This study focuses on legislative production concerning women in the Federal Senate, with an emphasis on the proposals made by male and female senators during the last two legislative periods, from 2015 to 2018 and from 2019 to 2022 (the 55th and 56th legislatures). The research discusses the relationships between group representation, with a focus on feminist authors, and addresses the internal dynamics of the Federal Senate's composition. Utilizing both quantitative and qualitative approaches, the study analyzes 134 bills introduced within the aforementioned timeframe, aiming to examine which themes are most frequent and which ones are most approved among the analyzed bills. Additionally, it investigates, based on gender and political party ideology, who proposes the most within these themes. The analysis reveals that the political party PODEMOS proposed the most within the analyzed theme, the state of Espírito Santo had the highest number of proposals, and 2019 was the year with the most activity. The most prevalent theme was violence against women, followed by policies on paternity and maternity, which were predominantly proposed by female legislators. Furthermore, the majority of the proposals originated from members of right-wing parties. By the end of the analysis period, at the close of the 56th legislature, 30 bills had been approved, and two had become laws.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Sistema de resolução de conflitos e o papel do Senado como Câmara revisora no bicameralismo brasileiro
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-08) RUBIATTI, Bruno de Castro
Brazil adopts a symmetrical and incongruent bicameral system, which means that both Cameras have similar legislative powers and different forms to select its members. In bicameralisms such this, the system of resolution of disputes between the Chambers becomes important. In Brazil is used navette system that bills go through sequential reads in both Chambers. This paper seeks to analyze this system focusing on the reviser ability of upper Chamber. For this, two steps must be performed: first of all, the analysis of the navette system in Brazil and highlighting the privileged character of the source Chamber. Following that, the analyze of the projects that are originated in the Chamber of Deputies, who undergo to a revision in the Senate, giving importance on its results. From these analyzes, it’s possible to point the reviewer role played by the Brazilian Senate bicameral legislative process.