Navegando por Assunto "Timetable point"

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Dimensionamento do volume útil de reservação de água considerando o consumo de energia elétrica no horário de ponta do setor elétrico
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2018-02-07) MOREIRA, Francisca Nara da Conceição; PEREIRA, José Almir Rodrigues; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9918600634569244
Determination of the useful volume of reservation for hydroenergetic efficiency in water supply systems. The research was carried out in the Guanabara, Ananindeua, Belém, Pará Pumping and Water Reservation System. For this, the Guanabara Sector's design and operational conditions were verified for hydroenergetic performance evaluation. In the second step three (3) useful theoretical reservation volumes were determined, considering different methods. In the third stage, considering four (4) different useful project volumes and three (3) theoretical, hydroenergetic simulations were performed to verify the most efficient useful volume in hydroenergetic terms. For that, the same consumption curve and mean pumping rate were considered, but different useful volumes in the simulations. In the research it was verified that the useful volume of the high reservoir of the Guanabara Sector does not allow the reduction of water pumping at peak hours, which, naturally, influences the value of electric energy expenditure and that the high reservoir was being used as " junction box". Thus, three alternatives were studied to modify the current operating situation of the Guanabara Sector Reservation Unit, aiming at reducing electricity consumption and expenditure. In the sizing of the useful volumes by the 3 methods studied, 808.96 m³ were obtained with the CETESB Method (1987), 936.77 m³ with the procedures recommended in NBR 12.217 (1994) and 1.411,10 m³ when the proposed method was used by Gomes (2012). In the simulations carried out in Epanet 2.0 resulted in an electric energy expense of R$ 25.789,54/month for the useful volume of the projected high reservoir. From R$ 26.363,87/month for the useful volume of the high reservoir CETESB (1987). From R$ 26.191,71/month to the useful volume of the high reservoir NBR 12.217 (1994). And for the method proposed by Gomes (2012) resulted in monthly expenses of R$ 14.698,95/month. However, the utilization of the useful volume of the reservoir as measured by the Gomes Method was about 66,39% higher than that of NBR 12.217 (1994), about 64,56% higher than that of the project and 57,33% higher than CETESB (1987). In this way, the higher value of the volume will impact the value to be invested for the implantation of the raised reservoir. For this reason, in the research was studied the economy with expenditure of electric energy over 10 years. Accordingly, considering the Gomes Method (2012), savings of R $ 1.379.131,30 (78,19%) were estimated in relation to NBR 12.217 (1994) and R $ 1.399.789,40 (79,36%) in relation to the CETESB Method (1987).