Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6488
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorSILVA, Priscilla Flores-
dc.creatorBRITO, Marcus Vinicius Henriques-
dc.creatorPONTES, Flávia Sirotheau Corrêa-
dc.creatorRAMOS, Suzana Rodrigues-
dc.creatorMENDES, Laís Cordeiro-
dc.creatorOLIVEIRA, Louize Caroline Marques-
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-25T13:36:19Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-25T13:36:19Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02-
dc.identifier.citationSILVA, Priscilla Flores et al. Copaiba oil effect on experimental jaw defect in Wistar rats. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, São Paulo, v. 30, n. 2, p. 120-126, Feb. 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015002000006. Disponível em: http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6488. Acesso em:.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1678-2674-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6488-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of copaiba oil on jaw defects repair in Wistar rats treated with bioglass or adipose tissue. METHODS: A jaw defect was randomly created in forty-two rats and filled with bioglass or adipose tissue. The two groups (Gbio and Gcell) were subdivided in three subgroups with seven animals each according to gavage administration: control (distillated water), oil (copaiba oil) and melox (meloxicam). Euthanasia was performed after forty post-operative days. The bone formation was analyzed regarding the histological aspects. RESULTS: The osteoclasts activity was observed only in four subgroups (p=0.78). Regarding the osteoblasts presence, it was very similar between the subgroups, the difference was due to Gcell-melox (p=0.009) that presented less osteoblastic activity. The inflammatory cells were more evident in Gcell-melox subgroup, however, there was no difference in comparison with the other subgroups (p=0.52). Bone formation was observed in all subgroups, just two animals showed no bone formation even after 40 days. More than 50% of bone matrix mineralization was observed in 56% (23 animals) of the analyzed areas. The bone matrix mineralization was not different between subgroups (p=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The subgroups that received copaiba oil showed bone repair, although not statistically significant in comparison to subgroups treated whit meloxicam or controls. Copaiba oil administered by gavage had no effect on bone repair in this experimental model.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Edisangela Bastos (edisangela@ufpa.br) on 2015-03-24T16:25:22Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 22190 bytes, checksum: 19e8a2b57ef43c09f4d7071d2153c97d (MD5) Artigo_CopaibaOilEffect.pdf: 669875 bytes, checksum: ce7267c64d5acab50d2f1440ed3db7d1 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Ana Rosa Silva (arosa@ufpa.br) on 2015-03-25T13:36:19Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 22190 bytes, checksum: 19e8a2b57ef43c09f4d7071d2153c97d (MD5) Artigo_CopaibaOilEffect.pdf: 669875 bytes, checksum: ce7267c64d5acab50d2f1440ed3db7d1 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-03-25T13:36:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 22190 bytes, checksum: 19e8a2b57ef43c09f4d7071d2153c97d (MD5) Artigo_CopaibaOilEffect.pdf: 669875 bytes, checksum: ce7267c64d5acab50d2f1440ed3db7d1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-02en
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia-
dc.relation.ispartofActa Cirúrgica Brasileira-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.source.urihttp://ref.scielo.org/t7654c-
dc.subjectPlantas medicinaispt_BR
dc.subjectÓleo de copaíbapt_BR
dc.subjectRegeneração ósseapt_BR
dc.subjectAnti-inflamatóriospt_BR
dc.subjectRato como animal de laboratóriopt_BR
dc.subjectPlantsen
dc.subjectMedicinalen
dc.subjectBone regenerationen
dc.subjectAnti-Inflammatory agentsen
dc.titleCopaiba oil effect on experimental jaw defect in Wistar ratsen
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsSOBRADPEC-
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8788028321547506-
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1180984403274256-
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3853022506850236-
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7763463771018956-
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2687223302542581-
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6935124190761059-
dc.citation.volume30-
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.spage120-
dcterms.citation.epage126-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015002000006-
dc.description.affiliationSILVA, P. F.; PONTES, F. S. C.; MENDES, L. C.; OLIVEIRA, L. C. M. Universidade Federal do Pará-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos Científicos - FOUFPA/ICS

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Article_CopaibaOilEffect.pdf654,17 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons