Copaiba oil effect on experimental jaw defect in Wistar rats

dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage120
dc.citation.volume30
dc.creatorSILVA, Priscilla Flores
dc.creatorBRITO, Marcus Vinicius Henriques
dc.creatorPONTES, Flávia Sirotheau Corrêa
dc.creatorRAMOS, Suzana Rodrigues
dc.creatorMENDES, Laís Cordeiro
dc.creatorOLIVEIRA, Louize Caroline Marques
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8788028321547506
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1180984403274256
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3853022506850236
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7763463771018956
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2687223302542581
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6935124190761059
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-25T13:36:19Z
dc.date.available2015-03-25T13:36:19Z
dc.date.issued2015-02
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of copaiba oil on jaw defects repair in Wistar rats treated with bioglass or adipose tissue. METHODS: A jaw defect was randomly created in forty-two rats and filled with bioglass or adipose tissue. The two groups (Gbio and Gcell) were subdivided in three subgroups with seven animals each according to gavage administration: control (distillated water), oil (copaiba oil) and melox (meloxicam). Euthanasia was performed after forty post-operative days. The bone formation was analyzed regarding the histological aspects. RESULTS: The osteoclasts activity was observed only in four subgroups (p=0.78). Regarding the osteoblasts presence, it was very similar between the subgroups, the difference was due to Gcell-melox (p=0.009) that presented less osteoblastic activity. The inflammatory cells were more evident in Gcell-melox subgroup, however, there was no difference in comparison with the other subgroups (p=0.52). Bone formation was observed in all subgroups, just two animals showed no bone formation even after 40 days. More than 50% of bone matrix mineralization was observed in 56% (23 animals) of the analyzed areas. The bone matrix mineralization was not different between subgroups (p=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The subgroups that received copaiba oil showed bone repair, although not statistically significant in comparison to subgroups treated whit meloxicam or controls. Copaiba oil administered by gavage had no effect on bone repair in this experimental model.en
dc.description.affiliationSILVA, P. F.; PONTES, F. S. C.; MENDES, L. C.; OLIVEIRA, L. C. M. Universidade Federal do Pará
dc.identifier.citationSILVA, Priscilla Flores et al. Copaiba oil effect on experimental jaw defect in Wistar rats. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, São Paulo, v. 30, n. 2, p. 120-126, Feb. 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015002000006. Disponível em: http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6488. Acesso em:.pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015002000006
dc.identifier.issn1678-2674
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufpa.br/handle/2011/6488
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
dc.publisher.initialsSOBRADPEC
dc.relation.ispartofActa Cirúrgica Brasileira
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.source.urihttp://ref.scielo.org/t7654c
dc.subjectPlantas medicinaispt_BR
dc.subjectÓleo de copaíbapt_BR
dc.subjectRegeneração ósseapt_BR
dc.subjectAnti-inflamatóriospt_BR
dc.subjectRato como animal de laboratóriopt_BR
dc.subjectPlantsen
dc.subjectMedicinalen
dc.subjectBone regenerationen
dc.subjectAnti-Inflammatory agentsen
dc.titleCopaiba oil effect on experimental jaw defect in Wistar ratsen
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dcterms.citation.epage126

Arquivo(s)

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Article_CopaibaOilEffect.pdf
Tamanho:
654.17 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.66 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: