Correlação clínico-laboratorial na amebíase intestinal

Abstract

Intestinal amoebiasis clinical diagnosis remains presumable and the correct diagnosis always need laboratorial confirmation. A hundred-five patients, of both sexes, age between 13 - 80 years-old, from passive demand of "Serviço Ambulatorial de Clínica Medica da Polícia Militar", were selected for this study in order to correlate the clinical findings and imunoenzimatic E. histolytica GIAP stool antigen search. The prevalence of intestinal amoebiasis was 13,33% (14/105) for single stool examination and 24,76% (26/105) for ELISA. When the two methods were compared, diference statistically significant it was found (p < 0,05 - McNemar). Among detected parasites by single stool examination: Endolimax. nana with 61,90% (65/105), Blastocystis hominis 28,57% (30/105). Entamoeba coli 18,10% (19/105) and Giardia lamblia 5,71% (6/105) were the most prevalent. Trichiuris trichiura with 4.76% (5/105) and A lumbricoides 3,81% (4/105) had the highest prevalence among helminths. The prevalence of such parasitic infections at the studied population was according to local casuistic. In the analysis of the symptomatology of ELISA positive patients, 73,08% (19/26) had reported one or more disease suggestive symptoms, and was observed abdominal pain in 46,15% (12/26) patients, diarrhoea with no abnormal elements in 42,31 % (11/26), tenesmus in 3,85% (1/26) and intestinal constipation 11,54% (3/26). The presence of such symptons when compared with clinical similar cases ELISA negative, were not significative (p > 0,05 - McNermar). In 4,76% patients (5/105), diarrhoea with mucosus and blood was refered. This association with ELISA positive test were observed in 3,84% (1/26), and was statistically significative when compared with ELISA negative ones. The results of this work shows the difficulties in establishing the clinics and laboratory correlation in intestinal amoebiasis. It occurs because of clinical syndroms are not so specifie and the need of different diagnosis, together to the error possibility in routine diagnosis methods. Its is suggested the inclusion of ELISA test in intestinal amoebiasis diagnosis as a necessary clinical resource although, it does not exclude the single stool examination to others parasites, due to be able to identify only the pathogen, Entamoeba histolytica.