2025-01-302025-01-302024-09-20LOBO, Ivonês Damasceno. Análise da qualidade de Estudos do Impacto Ambiental (EIA) para licenciamento de mineradoras no estado do Amapá. Orientadora: Nírvia Ravena. 2024. 123 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Planejamento do Desenvolvimento) - Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, 2024. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/16795. Acesso em:.https://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/16795In the context of sustainable development, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) emerges as an essential instrument in the environmental licensing process for public or private ventures with significant impacts. In Brazil, the Resolution No. 01/1986 of CONAMA (National Environmental Council) established basic criteria for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Impact Report (RIMA). However, globalization has driven changes in production patterns, leading to the emergence of corporate interests seeking to relax environmental licensing rules. This trend, particularly evident during the administrations of Temer and Bolsonaro, has resulted in policies more favorable to the business sector, including proposals for mineral exploration in indigenous lands. In the Amazon, this translates into a history of Large Projects that often exploit the region to the benefit of other parts of the country, leaving negative socio-environmental impacts. The quality of EIAs for mining enterprises in the state of Amapá is a point of concern, especially considering the dismantling of the environmental licensing process in Brazil since the 1980s. In this sense, this study aims to evaluate the quality of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) of mining ventures in the state of Amapá. The research problem to be addressed is: How have quality standards been implemented in Environmental Impact Assessments conducted by mining enterprises in Amapá? To achieve this, the quality of three mining EIAs for mining projects in the state of Amapá will be assessed using the internationally recognized Lee and Colley Review Package methodology. The results indicate that the studies are “unsatisfactory due to important omissions or inadequate points”.Acesso AbertoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/QualidadeEstudo de impacto ambientalMineraçãoAmapáDissertaçãoCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA::ECONOMIA AMBIENTAL::ECONOMIA DOS RECURSOS NATURAISGESTÃO DE RECURSOS NATURAISDESENVOLVIMENTO SOCIOAMBIENTAL