Navegando por Orientadores "STEINBRENNER, Rosane Maria Albino"

Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Comunicação e resistência: meios e usos da comunicação por grupos sociais atingidos pelo desastre da Hydro Alunorte em Barcarena, Pará
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2020-10-28) SANTOS, Andressa Arielly de Souza; STEINBRENNER, Rosane Maria Albino; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1508467019000744; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4321-7245
communication triggered by the social groups affected by the Hydro Alunorte disaster, in Barcarena, Pará, located in a historical context of environmental injustice (ACSERALD, 2001) that crosses the socio-environmental conflicts in the Amazon. What motivated our study was the fact that the media coverage of the environmental disaster, denounced by local communities and occurred in the beginning of 2018, involving the leakage of tailings from the Norwegian company Hydro Alunorte, leader in the global aluminum market, has achieved national repercussion. and international, but with little space for popular and local voices (STEINBRENNER, GUERREIRO NETO; BRAGANÇA; CASTRO, 2020). Thus, our intention, based on an exploratory study of a qualitative character (YIN, 2016), considering a period of 24 months from the occurrence of the disaster, was precisely to seek the other voices, usually and historically invisible, in order to understand, from the perspective of mediatization (HEPP, 2014), the communication processes and practices (FRANCE, 2016) for resistance (PERUZZO, 1998) that mark in this period the actions of the mobilized social groups, in what we call the field of communicative resistance, in reaction to the impacts caused by the disaster and in the defense of rights and their territories in the municipality of Barcarena, understood as mining "sacrifice zone" (CASTRO, 2019).
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Comunicação pública da ciência na Amazônia: uma análise dos processos comunicacionais do projeto Ciência na Ilha, em Cotijuba, Belém-PA
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2021-12-09) BATISTA, Elissandra Cristina; STEINBRENNER, Rosane Maria Albino; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1508467019000744
The axis of this research aims to understand how the communication processes of the project "Science on the Island: education and scientific divulgation in the Amazon" contribute to the dialogue and interaction between scientific knowledge and the knowledge of the riverside population of Cotijuba Island, in Belém, Pará. Highlighting the context of face-to-face communication in which the extension project UFPA‘s Science Club takes place, the communicational processes of the event are investigated through the theories of Public Communication of Science and the relational paradigm, in which the communication ceases to be a restricted process and is taken as a place of constitution of social phenomena. In the logic of the ecology of knowledges, defended by Boaventura Santos, and also by the process of learning to unlearn, the science fair is also analyzed through the lens of decolonial theories, which seek to break with the Cartesian methods of abyssal modern thinking, which creates imaginary lines of visibility and invisibility, bypassing the world's sociocultural diversity. Considering that one of the objectives of Science on the Island is to make science and the riverside communities Interact and vice-versa, the premises of the ecology of knowledge are essential in this investigation. In the methodological procedures it is made a content analysis, under Bardin‘s inspiration, of the documental program of 11 editions of the fair, between 2006 and 2019, with special focus on five of them, held on Cotijuba island, at the Marta da Conceição State School; and also semi-structured interviews with students and teachers of the riverside school and of the UFPA‘s Science Club, that has held the fair in schools on the most populated islands of Belém for 15 years. The methodology also includes the observation of the communicational processes in two editions of the Science on the Island, in Cotijuba. Thus, the fair reveals itself in this study with multiple characteristics of Public Communication of Science, with strong traces of the unidirectional and functionalist system, but also within relational dialogical conceptions. By involving experimental research on the daily life and experiences of basic education students, the project contributes to the demystification process of scientific production. And as an interactional device it creates bridges between diversities and asymmetries, crossing the river and seeking to overcome the abyssal lines of knowledge.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
O futuro ancestral da comunicação política: análise e reflexões sobre as primeiras candidaturas indígenas para deputadas federais do Pará
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2025-03-14) PEREIRA, NailanaThiely Salomão; STEINBRENNER, Rosane Maria Albino; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1508467019000744; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4321-7245
In the last seven decades, indigenous peoples began to elect their first representatives for elected positions, and the growth of this participation in electoral processes in Brazil has drawn researchers' attention to reflections on this expansion as a sociopolitical phenomenon (Baniwa, 2003, 2006, 2010, 2022; De Paula, 2017, 2023; Harari, 2023; Jecupé, 1998; Lima, 2010, 2022; Oliveira, 1968; Oliveira, 1983; Pataxó, 2023; Terena, 2021; Tuxá, 2020; Verdum, 2004, 2023). The communicational dimension, however, still intersects these studies in an incipient manner. Few studies have explored how indigenous peoples engage with political party communication, their contributions, the impact of campaign strategies on electoral mobilization among both non-indigenous and indigenous people, and the cultural barriers faced by these groups. Despite the Federal Constitution of 1988 recognizing the social and cultural organizations of indigenous peoples as the basis for differentiated citizenship – a notion that is explained, according to Baniwa (2022), to the extent that indigenous peoples have specific rights, in addition to those extended to the rest of Brazilian citizens, representation in the Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary is still proportionally incipient for indigenous people to participate politically more actively in decisions that concern their peoples and the country, as a whole. The right to differentiated political citizenship, and the gaps in studies on the challenges of partisan political communication of indigenous people in Brazilian elections are the starting point and justification of this study, which aims to analyze the candidacy of the first two indigenous women for federal deputies in the state of Pará, their ontologies and reaffirmations of themselves as indigenous candidates, seeking to understand the strategies and challenges of electoral communication, especially in view of the structural inequalities of the electoral process in Brazil. For this, we use the concept of Countercolonization by Nego Bispo (2015), the Critical Studies of Whiteness by Deivison Faustino (2017), Priscila Elisabete Da Silva (2017), W. E.B. Du Bois (1920, 1935); Frantz Fanon (1952); Albert Memmi (1957), Steve Biko (1978) and Alberto Guerreiro Ramos (1957), Lourenço Cardoso (2017), Daniela Núñez Longhini (2022), Lia Schucman (2017), Bento, (2002) and the communicational vision of Paulo Freire (1976, 1981, 1986, 1987, 1994), through a mixed and in-depth investigation of the candidates' campaign, complementing the reflections with theorists of resistance to coloniality. Among the various asymmetries (ontological, structural, financial, racial), the need to implement a special and differentiated election for indigenous peoples, with reserved seats in Parliament, proved to be a proposal for urgent debate and implementation.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Participação social e radiofusão pública no Pará: um estudo de caso do Conselho curador da FUNTELPA nos anos de 2009 e 2010
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2021-11-17) LEITE, Fabrício Rocha de Souza; STEINBRENNER, Rosane Maria Albino; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1508467019000744; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4321-7245
Public broadcasting in Brazil began as a state expression. Public system communication vehicles were directly linked to government agencies to publicize their agendas to the population. In Pará, it was no different and the Fundação Paraense de Radiodifusão – FUNTELPA, which today encompasses TV Cultura, Rádio Cultura and Portal Cultura from Pará, was created in 1977 for broadcasting services in the state. With the creation of Empresa Brasileira de Comunicação – EBC in 2007 and two years later with the first National Conference on Communication, public broadcasting (PIERANTI, 2018; PAULINO, 2013; ZUCULOTO, 2010; KOPS, 2011) gains a prominence never seen before. Pará followed this national movement and created in 2007 the Secretariat of Communication – SECOM and in the following year reformulated FUNTELPA, creating a collegiate structure based on social councils. We start from dialogues between habermasian public sphere with public communication (GIL; MATOS E NOBRE, 2013; BRANDÃO, 2012; DUARTE, 2007; KUÇOUSKI, 2013; ATKINSON, 1997; DETONI, 2016; BANDA, 2009) and contributions of democratic theories (HABERMAS, 1984, 1995; MOUFFE, 2005; LACLAU; MOUFFE, 1987; COUTINHO, 2006; CARPENTIER, 2011; GOHN, 2011; NOGUEIRA, 2015; AVRITZER, 2015; NOBRE, 2004; MIGUEL, 2013) to investigate how the role of the FUNTELPA Board of Trustees as an instance of social participation took place, in light of the principles enshrined in the public broadcasting model in the years 2009-2010? This case study had a qualitative approach, with data collection and evidence gathering through documentary and bibliographical research in dialogue with the methodology of oral history, with in-depth online interviews, via the Zoom app, with representatives from civil society in the Board of Trustees, bringing to light the main constraints on participation, themes, debates, decisions and legacy. According to Gohn (2011), Avritzer (2002, 2009) and Maciel (2010) about the council as a place of democratic intensity, the experience of the FUNTELPA Board of Trustees in the analyzed time, which is shown to be the only period in fact active and formally registered, was an important but limited initiative. In terms of Carpentier (2011), it was a hybrid experience, alternating moments of participation, interaction and access, understanding how the author, that participation is directly linked to the joint decision (co-deciding), access to simple presence and the interaction with socio-communicative relationships, without joint production or collective decision. As a model of mobilization, control and social participation, it could, therefore, have been more in-depth and more open to participation.