Teses em Gestão de Recursos Naturais e Desenvolvimento Local na Amazônia (Doutorado) - PPGEDAM/NUMA
URI Permanente para esta coleçãohttps://repositorio.ufpa.br/handle/2011/16064
Navegar
Navegando Teses em Gestão de Recursos Naturais e Desenvolvimento Local na Amazônia (Doutorado) - PPGEDAM/NUMA por Autor "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5584-8688"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Gestão integrada de recursos hídricos por comitês de bacia hidrográfica na Amazônia: o caso do comitê da bacia hidrográfica do rio Marapanim, no Pará(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2024-05-29) SILVA JUNIOR, Monaldo Begot da; FLORES, Maria do Socorro Almeida; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8875436559577793; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9154-6938; MENDES, Ronaldo Lopes Rodrigues; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3384080521072847; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5584-8688The main objective of this research is to analyze the implementation of water resources management by a river basin committee in the Amazon of Pará and the creation and performance of the Marapanim River Basin Committee (CBHRM). There is an institutional asymmetry among the regions of Brazil regarding the implementation of water resources management by basin committees, because the North region has the lowest percentage of its territorial area covered by committees, in relation to the other Brazilian regions and that is why the study of the creation of the CBHRM, the first in Pará, is justified. The research was guided by the interdisciplinary epistemological approach. The theory of commons and socio-ecological systems (SES) were used as theoretical and methodological contributions and the concept of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). This research has a qualitative nature, a descriptive approach and it was decided to conduct it through the case study methodology. The methodological procedures of content analysis were used with the help of IRAMUTEQ. The results demonstrated the emergence of 6 classes of words, which were grouped into four categories. In the results presented by the ecological category, it was noted the combination between the variable of resource system and unit of resources, symbolizing, respectively, the Marapanim River Basin (BHRM) and its water resources. The category of actors was related to the organization and interests of the government, water users and civil entities in the creation of the CBHRM, which symbolizing the category of the governance system. The category of interactions and results demonstrated the role of CBHRM to structure itself as a new institution of participation in water management. The theoretical contribution of this research is based on the recognition that for the collective construction of the watershed as a socio-ecological system, its actors must share a common thought about the needs of an integrated management of water resources by a basin committee, aiming at local development. In addition, the research contributed in a practical way with SEMAS and CBHRM to the elaboration of the future plan of the Marapanim River basin through the technological product entitled "Participatory Diagnosis of the Socioecological System of the Marapanim River Basin". Another applicable contribution of this research is the technological product entitled "Technical Report of the Case Study of the Marapanim River Basin Committee", which is intended for the members of the collegiate, with a view to expanding knowledge for decision-making. It is concluded that the social actors of the Marapanim River basin, including water users and civil entities, have recognized their common socio-ecological problems and also the need for organization in the interest of transforming their political relations to favor the creation of their committee, which has limited decision-making power, reduced scope, results restricted to institutional formalization and still needs to mature the common understanding of its competencies and expand the scope of the their knowledge about the variables of the socio-ecological system of the respective basin, involving public actors.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Governanças da água em hidroterritórios conflituosos: possibilidades e limites da aplicação da outorga coletiva no estado do Pará(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2023-04-04) MAIA, Paulo Cesar Chagas; MENDES, Ronaldo Lopes Rodrigues; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3384080521072847; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5584-8688; VASCONCELLOS SOBRINHO, Mário; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7843288526039148; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6489-219XThis research has the general objective of analyzing the water management model in conflicting hydroterritories and the possibilities of implementing the governance structure and the organization of collective grants. The theoretical framework of the research was outlined under the literature of institutional governance, water governance, integrated management of water resources, hydroterritories, granting of rights to water resources and collective granting. The methodology was based on a case study with a qualitative and quantitative approach. In this analysis, documentary research is also used in texts produced by the State Secretariat for the Environment and Sustainability (SEMAS), such as: environmental management reports, state listing of grants and State Water Resources Plan (products and diagnoses), mainly accessing State Information System on Water Resources (SEIRH/PA), in addition to consulting the Report of the Pastoral Land Commission (CPT). The study area of the research was the Araguaia-Tocantins Hydrographic Region (RHAT), more specifically the Itacaiúnas River Hydrographic Basin (BHRI) because it has large mineral enterprises with areas of conflict over water use. The results reveal that the granting of the right to use water works as a disciplinary element to support decision-making processes in the management of the water territory, as it guarantees to mediate the control and use of water in a region, avoiding or reducing adjacent conflicts between the different users, safeguarding an effective exercise of the right of access to this resource through regulation, enabling the use of water in the hydrographic basins of the state of Pará. They show, even though through the grant, the main conflicts for the use of water in RHAT, more specifically in the BHRI, characterizing the generating activities, the municipalities, the use of water, the type and classification of the conflict for the use of water. water, situation and category of conflict in the hydroterritory. In this scenario, there are still many challenges, limitations and difficulties for the process of implementing the grant of water resources in a hydrographic basin, in this case the BHRI and they are: the territorial dimension of the state makes it difficult to carry out technical inspections, the presence of rivers with the influence of the tide, lack of technical training and human resources, release of treated or untreated effluents into the urban drainage network, inconsistencies and quality of information provided in grant requirements, among others. The hydroterritories of the state of Pará are permeated by economic activities, such as: industry, agriculture, hydroelectricity, public supply and mining (large projects, prospecting and prospecting). These activities generate conflicts that are directly or indirectly reflected in the use of water, causing extensive areas degraded by irregular occupation of the soil, pollution and obstruction of watercourses, absence of riparian vegetation, release of domestic and industrial effluents. The research also examined the following possibilities for the implementation of the collective grant: identification of the conflict, preposition of the Local Management Commission, institutionalization of the Basin Committee, technical analysis of the grant and decision-making power. The limits were: notion of water abundance in the Amazon, the managing body in the case of SEMAS, must recognize the presence of conflicts over water use, the non-existence of the Committee at BHRI and the need to strengthen the granting instrument. A participatory governance model was proposed for the use of water at BHRI, using collective entitlement as a local public action.