Artigos Científicos - FAFIL/IFCH
URI Permanente para esta coleçãohttps://repositorio.ufpa.br/handle/2011/3780
Navegar
Navegando Artigos Científicos - FAFIL/IFCH por Periódicos "Revista de Filosofia Transformação"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Artigo de Periódico Acesso aberto (Open Access) Progresso científico e verdade em Popper(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-08) DIAS, Elizabeth de AssisThis paper aims to show that to solve the question of the possibility of scientific progress, Popper had to introduce the idea of truth into his theory of science. This conception of progress, in terms of the notion of truth, was only outlined in the work Conjectures and Refutations (1963). The idea that the goal of science is truth does not appear in his early works. When Popper wrote his The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934), science was defined in terms of logic-methodological rules, and not of its goals. Scientific progress was conceived based on the notions of testability and corroboration of theories, logical and methodological requirements for a theory to be considered scientific. Popper did not relate the question of scientific progress to notion of truth in this work, because when he wrote it he did not have a consistent theory of truth. It was only after Tarski had written his article on the semantic conception of truth that Popper, based on this conception of truth, could complement his thesis about the progress of science expounded in The Logic of Scientific Discovery with a theory about the content of truth and the approximation to the truth.Artigo de Periódico Acesso aberto (Open Access) Rousseau Misantropo(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-06-24) CORÔA, Pedro Paulo da CostaThe purpose of this article is to show how Rousseau, in his Letter to D’Alembert, takes up the classic debate between theatre and morals on the same grounds established by Plato. In Rousseau’s work, the debate about theatre has an objectivity that we do not find in D’Alembert’s article. Therefore, what is involved is not a difference of opinion between Rousseau and D’Alembert, but a difference in the philosophical ability to fully understand what concerns both theatre and morality.