Navegando por Assunto "Acordo de pesca"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Acordo de pesca do Rio Caeté, Bragança, Pará: análise do processo de construção(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2024-03-25) TAVARES, Mayra Patrícia Corrêa; OLIVEIRA, Marcelo do Vale; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2841179890845657; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6047-939X; BARBOZA, Roberta Sá Leitão; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9331256487699477; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2367-553XThis research was developed from September 2019 to February 2023. The construction of this work was made by a bibliographic review about the theme: fishing agreements in the Amazon, use of common resource and territory, besides direct observation, semi structured interviews, use of participatory techniques (problem tree, participatory mapping, historical matrix) and analysis of collected data. According to demands of the riverside dweller communities on the Caeté River about improper fishing in the estuarine area and apprehension of fishing material, it was observed how the implementation process of the fishing agreement of Caeté River begun, such as it was analyzed several conflicts that occurred between the social actor in the space of the river that were narrated by the fishermen and community dwellers. Based on bibliographic research, the bragantina region is the first to develop a fishing agreement in the coastal region of Caeté, northeast of Pará. The fishing agreement of Caeté River is focused on at least 20 communities on the middle of Caeté River, situated on the bragantina coastal plain, northeast of Pará. The research aimed to comprehend the construction process of the fishing agreement of middle Caeté River in Bragança, Pará, analyzing the conflicts between the subject users of the space. By means of the collected data, it was determined that the conflicts of the local social groups with external fishermen and Public Bodies complicated the control and maintenance of fishing territories in the studied area. External and local fishermen introduced fishing practices that are considered “improper” by the communities as well as by environmental inspection agencies, causing several conflicts between them and the Municipal Inspection Agencies. Thus, it was possible to imply that the management rules locally established by the municipal secretariat of aquaculture and fishing of the city of Bragança together the fishermen showed an effective scenario in the maintenance of fishing stocks. Whereas that, it is noted that the agreement is an instrument of participative management, conditioning the access of a responsible way to natural resources of the estuarine where the traditional populations of the Caeté River live.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Acordos de pesca como instituição social de governança dos territórios de pesca em prol do manejo sustentável dos recursos pesqueiros: o caso de Limoeiro do Ajuru-PA(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2021-01-28) RODRIGUES, Suzi Carolina Moraes; LOPES, Luis Otávio do Canto; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1013147545099173; CARVALHO, André Cutrim; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1089731342748216Fisheries agreements arise from the mobilization of fishing communities that create rules in common agreement to conserve fishing resources in their territories in order to guarantee income and food security, in addition to strengthening social ties between individuals. This work aims to analyze the process of creating fisheries agreements, especially their implications as mechanisms of territorial governance for local development in the municipality of Limoeiro do Ajuru, exposing fishing in its symbolic aspects and cultural. This work is a case study in the Prainha fishing agreement located in the municipality of Limoeiro do Ajuru-PA. First, an extensive bibliographic survey was prepared. The field research was exploratory. For data collection, interviews and participant observation techniques were used. The interviews were conducted with individuals working in the fisheries agreements and with members of the communities where the agreement is in force, and the method of key informants was used. It was intended with the interview, to know: how they see the fisheries agreements; whether the creation of the agreements brought benefits; if they have contributed with the fish stocks; what are the positive and negative points; where they can improve. It was observed that the fisheries agreements act as a social governance institution for the fishing territories since the fishing communities are mobilized and create rules in common agreement to safeguard the fishing resources in their territories. At the end of this study, it was noticed how the fishing agreements positively influence the fishing territories, acting as a mediator of conflicts in the fishing territories, as an empire of the fishing communities by giving voice and power of action to the local subjects who can create rules that will manage fisheries resources. And, mainly, by guaranteeing the sustainable management of fishery resources, always guaranteeing the availability of stocks and maintaining the food security of riverside dwellers. In addition, the agreements must be expanded beyond the fisheries aspects. They must cover other aspects such as the management of solid waste in rivers, the issue of fishing in the streams, illegal hunting, among others, as these are actions of relevant importance because all these topics mentioned are intertwined with fishing practice. This is because the fishing activity is not something isolated from the other activities in the riverside space, but it is necessary for that. However, it is necessary for the municipality, state and federal government to be present with the fisheries agreements to help them in their consolidation.