Navegando por Assunto "Direito constitucional"

Agora exibindo 1 - 8 de 8

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Análise dos instrumentos normativos reguladores da aquisição de alimentos destinados à alimentação escolar municipal belenense após a emenda constitucional nº 64/10: comparação entre a práxis e a garantia social estabelecida pela “constituição cidadã”
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2018-08-08) SILVA, Wadih Brazão e; SÁ, Naiza Nayla Bandeira de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1712074978664736; ARAÚJO, Marília de Souza; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9371703949781020
Taking as a reference the scientific evidence that inadequate food results in a variety of health problems, as well as the fact that, from 2010, food has been elevated to the category of social law set forth in the Federal Constitution through Constitutional Amendment number 64, the present study is directed to the research about the effective observation of this right in relation to the student population that receives school meals in the city of Belém from the year of validity of said Amendment, delimiting the period from February 2010 to February 2018. Therefore, it assumed as a premise that the full realization of the social right to food only occurs if the food has nutritional value and that this condition is in the drafting of normative instruments (Bidding Documents and Public Call Records) governing the acquisition of food intended for school lunches in the municipality. The study focused on the poor quality of school meals in some schools in Belém, analyzing the normative instruments of municipal public acquisition of food for school meals in the light of the quality criteria recommended by the National School Feeding Program (PNAE) and of the dispositions of the current legislation, and proposes alternatives for the mitigation of the mentioned problem.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A constitucionalidade da norma antielisiva no direito tributário brasileiro
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2004) OLIVEIRA, Fernando Augusto Braga; SCAFF, Fernando Facury; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3214760192523948
This study aims to demonstrate the constitutionally of the general rule "antielisiva" inserted in the Brazilian Law with the alteration of the article 116, already existing and the interpretation that should be accomplished in a context that needs to observe the Federal Constitution of 1988, with the several prevision of social rights. The rule brings about the matter of the individual front to social, freedom front to equality, the search of the material truth, without rights violation. lt is made an approach on the interpreter and the interpretation of the rules and pricipies, the need of application of the proportionality principles with the search of the material truth and the Fiscal Justice without violation of the fundamental warranties of the individual in special of the taxpayer. The necessary presentation to disclose positivist arguments that intentionally forget the constitutional fundamentais foressen in the 1st. and 3rd. Articles of the Federal Constitution of 1988. Paradigms and prejudices were set aside to acknowledge the sense of the "antielisiva" rule in the Brazilian Law. The demonstratiofi of the difference between the "elision" and fiscal evasion became indispensable for removing afterwards the difficulties that were the inconstitutionality allegations of the "antielisão" rule in Brazil, for possible affront to the legality and the freedom. It was used arguments on the ground of the Federal Constitution and based on the foreseen provision of the New Brazilian Civil Code After the disclosure of the respective constitutionally, based on the context, pursuant article 116, only paragraph of CTN, presenting at the end some guidelines as suggention for the application of the "antielisão" rule in the Brazilian Law. It was accomplished a doctrinary research with incursion in laws and respective jurisprudency. Intentionally to conclude, it was not made comparison with any foreign legislation, as the main purpose of this study is exclusively, the application of the rule in Brazil.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
De direito indigenista a direitos indígenas: desdobramento da arte do enfrentamento
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2009) MACHADO, Almires Martins; BELTRÃO, Jane Felipe; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6647582671406048; BENATTI, José Heder; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6884704999022918
This paper addresses the right Guarani, with its principles, nuances in conversation and subsumption of community issues. How to resolve conflicts in various fields of law, in a society Guarani. Discusses the importance that traditional religion has for the native law, which stems from the holistic mind. Discusses the principles of law Guarani: solidarity, reciprocity and prevalence of the collective interest of the individual. While dealing with indigenous law, the focus is on the right to hold property Guarani. The value is the theoretical framework of legal pluralism, to sustain it as a legal system, although thought and legislated differently than national law. In the end, enters on the adverse outcomes of external intervention, without due care anthropological necessary to such actions, departing in this case who is in charge of defending the legal right and interest indigenous. Explains the difficulty that has to work with right of indigenous peoples, to the limited literature that deals with it and because each indigenous people has its own ways of thinking and applying the law.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A eficácia das decisões de controle concentrado de constitucionalidade nos sistemas italiano e espanhol
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2010) FREITAS, Juliana Rodrigues; MAUÉS, Antonio Gomes Moreira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5100632338260364
The Italian´s and Spanish´s systems of concentrated control of constitutionality have features that distance them from the pure kelsen´s model and, at the same time, allow us to identify them with the North American´s model of constitutionality control. The assignment of binding effect, in horizontal and vertical planes, to the constitutional decisions, even if it is not an element used to identify, so immediately, the constitutional jurisdiction of the European countries, is, undoubtedly, one of its characteristic elements, and gives rise, in this context, to the figure of the previous binding. So for these precedents may be adopted in regard to the principle of equality in law enforcement, it is essential that requirements are defined in a reasonable and objective way, due to the Constitutional Courts gives effect binding to its decisions.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Jurisdição constitucional e precedentes vinculantes no Brasil
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2011) MAGALHÃES, Breno Baía; MAUÉS, Antonio Gomes Moreira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5100632338260364
The work provides some discussion regarding the binding effect, which aim to reconcile such institute within the practice of Brazilian judicial review, pointing out the importance of the constitutional interpretation made by the Supreme Court and the protection of fundamental rights. In said work, precedents are binding principles, which have gravitational force justified by the principle of equality in applying the law and the constitutional complaint is considered an important instrument for the interpretation of the binding precedent, capable of keeping the ways open for further distinguishing or reconsideration of prior decisions. Thus, the category that imposes the formal binding is the decision norm, which is a legal proposition able to sustain the ruling of the court on the (un) constitutionality of the act. We conclude that the refusal to give a broader transcendent binding effect indicates a strengthening of the diffuse control, allowing the interpretation and development of the precedents. Ronald Dworkin´s theory of law was chosen to support the conclusions of the study.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Parâmetros para justiciabilidade do direito social à saúde: o caso do estado do Pará
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2012-06-26) FERREIRA, Gabriela de Cássia Moreira Abreu; LOUREIRO, Violeta Refkalefsky; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3092799127943216
From the health care judicialization debate and their budgetary and public policies planning impacts, the research works on the assumption that the Judiciary should seek rational criteria in this kind of demand, proposing parameters for this task; also seeking to restore the balance between individual and collective aspects of health rights. Therefore, a constitutional and health law approach is presented, under the evidence-based medicine paradigm. The Brazil Federal Supreme Court jurisprudence on health social right is exposed and systematized, emphasizing the Public Hearing held in 2009 in this Court. Seeking to understand how and if this latest debate found echoes in regional and local reality, Pará State Court of Justice cases, tried between 2008 and 2011, were searched and compared with the previous analysed Federal Supreme Court jurisprudence; also exposing the demands’ characteristics from the following criteria: author species, legal representation, disease, applicants’ profile, demand results (and others), as well as the main arguments presented by the authors, defendants and judges. From our survey, specific health right justiciability parameters are proposed, influenced by Ronald Dworkin’s law as integrity theoretical framework, restoring the integration between public subjective right and collective right, as complementary nature to the right to health.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Pluralismo constitucional interamericano: a leitura plural da constituição de 1988 e o diálogo entre o supremo tribunal federal e a corte interamericana de direitos humanos
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-10-19) MAGALHÃES, Breno Baía; MAUÉS, Antonio Gomes Moreira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5100632338260364
The thesis argues for the Constitutional Pluralism as a theory better suited to describe and explain the interactions between the 1988 Federal Constitution and the American Convention on Human Rights. Said interactions present themselves through the precedents of both the Supreme Court and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The thesis posits the theoretical fragility and the contextual mismatch of approaches based upon the monism/dualism dichotomy. Constitutional Pluralism, in turn, suggests the heterarchical interaction between constitutional orders through reciprocal influences. The supralegalty of international human rights treaties and the deference to regional constitutional interpretations enables the 1988 Constitution and the American Convention on Human Rights, respectively, to influence the substantive content of the fundamental and human rights through the deliberative dialogue between precedents and by having the construction of the pro homine principle as an ideal interpretive guide shared by both. Although Constitutional Pluralism is to be considered the theory that justifies the plural reading of the Brazilian constitutional provisions, the Supreme Court, despite the citations of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights precedents, does not dialogue with them.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Terras tradicionalmente ocupadas por índios: fundamentos para uma aplicação limitada da Súmula 650 do STF
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2007) SILVA, Maria Eliza Nogueira da; COSTA, Paulo Sérgio Weyl Albuquerque
The pluralism is a mark of the contemporary democracy and the Constitution of 1988 represented an important progress in the protection of the diversities in Brazil, consecrating the multiplicity of ideas, cultures and ethnic groups, and presupposing the dialogue between opinions and divergent thoughts. In this context, the indigenous people acquired the right of have its culture recognized, in other words, their ethnic-cultural specificities were respected, guaranteeing them the right to be and to remain as Indians. The delimitation and the protection of an appropriate territorial space for the different indigenous people are considered as an essential condition for the physical and cultural survival of those groups. The present work intends, then, to analyze the interpretation adopted by Federal Supreme Court of Brazil (Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF) in a document named Súmula 650, concerning the term "Native Lands" (Federal Constitutions of Brazil/1988 art. 231, §§ 1st and 2nd), in way to understand its reach and application limits. For this, initially, the itinerary of the concept was rebuilt on STF, analyzing the decisions concerning this subject. The initial landmark of this discussion is the document named Súmula 480 and his precedents, and the end is the Súmula 650, including the analysis of the cases that it conformed. As a result, was verified, that in the decisions before Súmula 650, the Court moved away from the civil concept of possession to contemplate a concept of native possession, in which the present time can be secondary, faced with evidences that attest the traditional occupation. From the precedents analysis of the Súmula 650, was verified that the judgment involved a specific historical context, in which the native people were extinct. On the other hand, generalizing arguments has been used and if they are indiscriminately applied they are supposed to cause serious damages to the native territorial rights, especially related to the restitution of traditional lands. From the results, it is possible to conclude that the Title of the Súmula 650 cannot be applied in generalized way, it must be presented as ground for an application limited to the facts related and historicity of the concrete case; the Convention 169 of the OIT and orientation of the “Agenda 21”; and the other interpretations from STF about the term "Native Lands".