Navegando por Assunto "Filosofia do direito"

Agora exibindo 1 - 12 de 12

Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Além da racionalidade dogmática: uma tentativa de reeleitura do conceito de validade jurídica com base na hermenêutica filosófica de Hans-Georg Gadamer
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2011) COSTA, Júlio César Sousa; COSTA, Paulo Sérgio Weyl Albuquerque; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4135075517359609
The present work deals with two major knowledge areas: Philosophy and Law. It results from a study aimed at approximating Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics and legal hermeneutics. This work results from trying to make a reflection on the concept of legal validity, seen as central to the dissertation calls "dogmatic rationality", based on Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, with its influence on law, and that puts forward as a philosophical perspective of positivism inherent in overcoming the current law, what is constructed by a new designation of what is meant by legal interpretation. To perform this research, started from the understanding of the concept of legal validity from the analysis of the Hans Kelsen’s work, as the author of the representative legal positivist tradition in thinking that dealt with more acuity of that concept, and in contrast to that, too one seeks to make the analysis of that concept in the Robert Alexy’s work, as an example of what has been called today "post-positivism" – that is, in an attempt to overcome the still prevailing dogmatic rationality in interpreting right, at least in Brazil. The theoretical approach involved, besides the central Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical perspective, the search for authors who do an analysis of their assumptions. We tried to illustrate, though, such an application, through a possible reading of the expanded concept of the hermeneutic circle proposed by the author. After all, there was certain fundamental concepts of Gadamer’s philosophy – such as the hermeneutic circle, the tradition, the temporal distance, the “awareness of the effects of history” and the application as a way of understanding – are also usable for legal interpretation enabling a more thorough reflection on the way to renewed understanding of the law. It is therefore a qualitative study and exploratory nature, of which methodological procedures departed, especially about its literature.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A ciência do direito como uma ciência humana: estudo sobre os fundamentos filosóficos e jurídicos do processo de autonomização epistemológica da Ciência do Direito de Hans Kelsen
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2014-05-29) MARTINS, Ricardo Evandro Santos; COSTA, Paulo Sérgio Weyl Albuquerque; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4135075517359609
The paper explains the philosophical foundations of the process of autonomization of the Hans Kelsen‟s Legal Science. The studies are focused on the debate about the epistemological foundation of the Human Sciences and how this influenced the Pure Theory of Law. The objectives are: a) investigate how the nineteenth-century debate about the epistemological foundation of the Human Sciences influenced the formulation of the kelsenian Legal Science; b) to study what are the legal and philosophical assumptions of the Kelsen‟s Pure Doctrine of Law c) to know what would have been the contributions of the Master of Vienna in this quest for reasons for give autonomy to Legal Science from Natural Sciences. Thus, the first Chapter discusses the Philosophical Positivism of August Comte and John Stuart Mill. The second Chapter introduces the movement of Neo-kantianism since Adolf Trendelenburg until the Marburg School. The third Chapter wants to know about the Philosophy of Wilhelm Dilthey and how He tried to make a "Critique of Historical Reason", as well as reasons for the Human Science comprehensive method. The fourth Chapter talks about the Neo-kantianism of the School of Baden, especially the Heinrich Rickert‟s Philosophy, explaining mainly the Principle of the worlds and The Principle for the concept-formation. The fifth Chapter deals with the formation of the tradition of legal positivism of the nineteenth century, especially the Germanic world. And finally, the sixth and last Chapter deals with the refutation by Kelsen to the Thesis of Gerber, Laband and Jellinek, and also, this finally chapter talks about the "the two methodological limits" of his Pure Doctrine of Law that, in the end, it can respond: yes, Kelsen did the Science of Law as Human Science, but not the same way as Rickert and other philosophers who discussed this topic since the nineteenth century. Kelsen was defending the idea of a Normative and Autonomous Legal Science that presupposes the postulate of axiological Relativism.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
O conceito Kantiano de paz perpétua sob a perspectiva cosmopolita contemporânea
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2019-03-15) SOUZA, Marcos Felipe Alonso de; MEIRELLES, Agostinho de Freitas; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7826494085324141
In a context of moral uncertainties and international humanitarian crises that characterize so well our century, pursuing an understanding of the problems that haunt men becomes relevant, also seeking a solution that brings, not the eradication, but, at least, the mitigation of the pains that the crises bring as a consequence. Kant, in Perpetual Peace (Zum Ewigen Frieden), is thinking about a solution to the pacification of international conflicts, and brings us valuables lessons on political and human relations. Kant introduces to us two fundamental themes in the context of our contemporaneity: multilateralism and alterity. The first one, is based on the conception of a confederation of States for peace and the second conception, is based on the hospitality for the foreigner, an idea of a universal citizenship right. In this sense, the aim of this research is to analyze the concept of peace for Kant within the function of the State that he developed, relating it to the contemporary cosmopolitan [dis]order. Finally, we try to answer the problematic issue about the role of the State in Kant's thought for the construction of peace and figure it out if this concept still remains current in front of contemporary international conflicts. In fact, there is a possibility of achieving the peace from Kant’s lessons, as long as we pursue more cooperation between nations and respect the human identity differences, two fundamental points already developed by Kant when he discussed the definitive elements for the achievement of peace. It is a conception of peace that is inserted in his philosophy of law and his political thought, directly related to his critique of practical reason.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Desacordos teóricos na filosofia do direito contemporânea: a influência da filosofia da linguagem no debate Hart-Dworkin e a tentativa de sua superação através da teoria dos planos de Scott Shapiro
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2018-02-08) RODRIGUES, Filipe Augusto Oliveira; MATOS, Saulo Monteiro Martinho de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1755999011402142
This work has as general objective to analyze the influence of philosophy of language on the Hart – Dworkin Debate and the overcoming tried by the planning theory of Scott Shapiro, focusing the theoretical disagreements. This objective is always sought by the mixture of two elements. In the first place, the exploration of the existing arguments in legal theory. Secondly, the relation of these arguments to those presented in fields of general philosophy. Our hypothesis is that the study of this debate and relationship show us that Dworkin's theory of disagreements is the best explanation of the problem, but at the same time the opposing theories chosen are using several methodological elements that represent advances that have been made in general philosophy, such as the perspective of the plans proposed by Michael Bratman. We attempt to demonstrate this hypothesis through the principal analysis of four authors and their influences, namely Ronald Dworkin, H.L.A. Hart, Jules Coleman, and Scott Shapiro. Through this analysis we hope to demonstrate how the foundations of the proposed theories have been changing the focus from philosophy of language to other fields and which is the state of legal theory with this advance. As result, we defend the point that the hypothesis is right and even without the best explanatory capacity, the new theories of law need to be better analyzed and their earnings better considered.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Direito e modernidade: a perspectiva teórica de Jürgen Habermas
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2006) SARMENTO, Jorge Alberto Ramos; BRITO, Daniel Chaves de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4547584911539063
This paper aims to show the law and modernity ideas under Jürgen Habermas perspective, which establishes a new model of reason as paradigm of overcome the crisis instituted at modernity, which reflects the legitimacy crisis of law itself. This is a bibliographic work, based upon Habermas publications on the matter, as well as wellknowed commenteres of this author. The start point was the law conception developed by great classic sociological thinkers, with emphasis on the diagnosis role of Max Weber, centred upon the instrumental rationality idea, criticized by Habermas for lacking greater conceptual precision at modernity pathologies identification. The Habermas diagnosis tries to accomplish that goal by a reconstructive work over modernity and law most important conceptions, considering the idea of communicative reason.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Ecofilosofia: do antropocentrismo ao ecocentrismo
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 1998) SILVA, Ricardo Albuquerque da; MATTOS NETO, Antonio José de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4719479439779242
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
O formalismo no direito e a ética dos valores: teoria dos valores em Hans Kelsen e Max Scheler
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2018-05-04) FONSECA, Yuri Ikeda; MATOS, Saulo Monteiro Martinho de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1755999011402142
The philosophy of values (Wertphilosophie), appearing in the context of the neo-Kantian investigations of the School of Baden in the late 19th Century, is a theoretical approach focused on the study of the phenomenon called value. The first chapter of this work, with the methodology of a history of ideas, discusses the formalist ethics of Immanuel Kant, the origin of the philosophy of values in the theories of Franz Brentano and neo-Kantians Hermann Lotze, Wilhelm Windelband, Heinrich Rickert and Emil Lask, and the division of the theory of values into an objectivist strand and a subjectivist one, trying to demonstrate that the latter has prevailed due to the influence of Friedrich Nietzsche's conceptions of values. The second chapter deals with Max Weber's idea of axiological neutrality (Wertfreiheit) of the sciences and Hans Kelsen's legal formalism, which is supported by a subjectivist and skeptical theory of values, both representing the subjectivist view. It is also presented Carlos Santiago Nino’s argument against the idea, defended by Kelsen, that only a relativistic conception of values could promote the democratic ideals of tolerance. The third chapter is dedicated, after a brief comment on Edmund Husserl's phenomenology, to Max Scheler's arguments against Kantian ethical formalism to support an objectivist axiology based on the notion that values are material contents that can be known a priori and are, therefore, capable of substantiating a nonformal ethic. It is concluded that, though Scheler’s statement of grounds is problematic in considering the knowledge of values as a function of emotions, not of reason, on the other hand his formulation of the a priori and of a scope of pure axiology with rules similar to those of logic facilitate objections to the presuppositions of the subjectivist axiology.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A hermenêutica dos direitos humanos e a diversidade cultural
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2010-06-08) LOUREIRO, Viviany Almeida; COSTA, Paulo Sérgio Weyl Albuquerque; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4135075517359609
This paper assumes that human rights not yet acquired the desired universality, being necessary for both the meeting arrangements that make possible a global protection of the right to liberty, equality and fraternity expressed in legal texts as the Universal Declaration of Human humans. To do so presents an analysis of the context in which it appears the search for a code of standards valid worldwide and, with the overall context, emphasizes the prevailing multiculturalism, which is taken as the main factor to be taken into account in implementing this project. Given this reality are two proposals: the hermeneutics of analog-iconic Mauricio Beuchot criticism and hermeneutics Joaquín Herrera Flores, both committed to respecting the dignity and human diversity. The way ideas are developed that shows the meeting points are identified with the philosophical hermeneutics of Hans Georg Gadamer, as well as the thinking of many scholars of human rights in multicultural contexts. Such coincidences suggest the existence of a new trend hermeneutics grounded in consideration of tradition and historicity of the subject, upon redemption of Aristotelian ethics and practice of dialogue, which reveals in its structure an operation that resembles the game that involves the hermeneutic Gadamer's philosophical, understanding that grasps the truth of the artwork.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Hermenêutica filosófica: um novo paradigma para a universalidade dos direitos humanos
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2009-07-01) LEITE, Ismael Lima; COSTA, Paulo Sérgio Weyl Albuquerque; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4135075517359609
The present work has its focus in the need to formulate a new pattern of universality towards Human Rights, in the sense of trying to build a truly global ethos, without any hegemonic or coactive presumptions, regularly used as a means to conform this kind of normalization, which rests under an abstract rationalism that isolates the individual from the world, or even canons of modern science’s methodology, poorly brought into humanities. To analyze Kant´s Solipsism and its formal aspects of deontological universality, which deny valorative dignity to tradition and create a cognitive individual divinity, as well as the epistemic intents of positivist’s reductionism logic on behalf of the occident’s and capitalism’s hegemony, as means of ideologic domination, making the mercantilist interests seen legitimate. These are challenges to be overcome by the ontologic and philosophical hermeneutics, which calls upon humankind onto its sense of finity, casting it into the world in order to, once in the world, remember the necessary friendship and solidarity, the only praxis capable of building an ethical sense for all humankind: live as if you were me.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A legitimidade da concessão judicial de medicamentos de alto custo na tutela individual: aspectos jurídicos, filosóficos e políticos
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2018-01-11) CASSEB, Ana Luísa Campos; BRITO FILHO, José Cláudio Monteiro de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7823839335142794
This work has as general objective to analyze the phenomenon of the judicialization of public health policies in Brazil, and for a particular purpose to reflect on the legitimacy of the judicial decisions that grant high cost drugs to individuals. The problem raised by these objectives is the following question: in what way can such decisions be considered as legitimate mechanisms of distributive justice, considering the legal, philosophical and political aspects of the legitimacy of such a circumstance? The present research supports the hypothesis that the three dimensions examined offer assumptions that are able to demonstrate the correctness of the redistributive act that occurs through these decisions. Thus, it is an eminently theoretical investigation, with an argumentative trait, since it seeks to contrast the existing positions on the subject in Brazilian constitutional law, in political philosophy, in the jurisprudence of the Federal Supreme Court, with special attention to the votes thus far in the judgment of Extraordinary Remedies no. 566.471/RN and 657.718/MG. As a result, after articulating the categories of the rule of law, equal opportunities and cooperative solidarity in the perspective of the right to health, this research is consolidated in order to affirm the justice in the redistributive practice of access to public health policies by judicial process
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
A questão da superveniência do direito no Marxismo jurídico brasileiro
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-11-20) SOUZA, Nathalia Karollin Cunha Peixoto de; COSTA, Paulo Sérgio Weyl Albuquerque; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4135075517359609
Having found two general opposing poles of Brazilian legal Marxist theory, we sought to analyze which of these two positions had a greater consonance with the theory developed by Marx. In this respect, the two divergent groups of Brazilian thought diverged under one fundamental aspect: law's superposition or not over capitalism. If the greater divergence between the two groups is the matter of whether or not law is supervening, or, what amounts to the same, if the greatest divergence between them is the question of whether or not the legal form is specific, we can conclude as a consequence that the touchstone of legal Marxist analysis boils down to whether Marx's theoretical work goes either along the lines of assigning an instrumental revolutionary role to law or, on the contrary, if Marx had actually attributed a conservative role to Bourgeois order to the legal form. As a response to the problem, after the analysis of Marx's work, it was possible to conclude that law is a social form that arose pari passu to the birth of the universal circulation of goods; The universal circulation of commodities, in turn, only became possible with the capitalist mode of production; Therefore, law was only possible with the establishment of capitalism. In this sense, it becomes possible to deduce that law is a specificity of the bourgeois system. In this way, the thesis of law's non-superposition has been confirmed. Communist right is, given these conclusions, unthinkable. Finally, as representatives of these two groups of opposing views on the theme of Marxism and law in Brazil, we opted to analyze the work of Lyra Filho, as a representative of the position in defense of the thesis of the superposition of law, as well as opting to study, as representatives of the opposing group, the works of Naves, Mascaro and Kashiura Jr.
Acesso aberto (Open Access)
Teoria naturalizada do Direito: um debate metodológico com Brian Leiter e seus críticos
(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-02-13) BRITO JUNIOR, Valdenor Monteiro; PINHEIRO, Victor Sales; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0416222855469529
The objective of this study is to discuss the methodology and ontology of general jurisprudence, whose aim is to elucidate the ontological nature of the Law, considering a defense of the naturalized jurisprudence. In opposition to the conceptual approach prevalent in contemporary legal theory, focusing about conceptual analysis and resource to intuitions, some theoreticians have accept empirical approaches that resource to sociological and anthropological insights to advance our understanding about the nature of Law. Among these empirical approaches, there is the defense of the naturalization of the general jurisprudence by Brian Leiter, discussing the Quine’s methodological naturalism whose point is the continuity between philosophy and science. The naturalized jurisprudence is founded on the resource to the conceptual schemas that are presupposed by our best scientific theories about the social human behavior for advancing the discussion about the real nature of Law. The criticism against these naturalized methodology and the limits of the Leiter’s version for naturalized jurisprudence are discussed and, in order for answer and/or account these objections, I propose a modified version of naturalized jurisprudence that it is more robust than the Leiter’s one, because it begins from less controversial premises and it conforms to contemporary analytic metaphysics and social ontology.