Logo do repositório
Tudo no RIUFPA
Documentos
Contato
Sobre
Ajuda
  • Português do Brasil
  • English
  • Español
  • Français
Entrar
Novo usuário? Clique aqui para cadastrar. Esqueceu sua senha?
  1. Início
  2. Pesquisar por Assunto

Navegando por Assunto "Plebiscito"

Filtrar resultados informando as primeiras letras
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Resultados por página
  • Opções de Ordenação
  • Carregando...
    Imagem de Miniatura
    ItemAcesso aberto (Open Access)
    Nem eu, nem o outro; qualquer coisa de intermédio: estudo exploratório de formas simbólicas sobre o plebiscito para a criação dos estados de Carajás e de Tapajós
    (Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-03-26) BRAGA, Thaís Luciana Corrêa; COSTA, Alda Cristina Silva da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2403055637349630
    In December 11th, 2011, the referendum proposed the creation of the Carajás and Tapajós States from the territorial division of the State of Pará. The total of 66% of Pará voters who attended the public consultation voted contrary to both proposals, while 33% of them voted in favor of the creation of two states. From this historic event for the Pará population, the research aims to understand the meanings produced by the newspapers O Liberal and Diário do Pará about the referendum in Pará from the definition of symbolic forms. I use the methodological framework of depth in hermeneutics (DH), proposed by J. B. Thompson, combined with techniques of historical analysis and content analysis. The survey sample consists of 135 issues, 57 of O Liberal and 78 of Diário do Pará. For the sample, I considered all editions of two newspapers published in June, July, November and December of 2011. However I selected only those containing some information about the referendum, regardless of journalistic genre. The development begins with the historical and geographical characterization of the territories of Carajás and Tapajós to put the proposal of Pará division over time. Then I reflect about the communication character of journalism: the correlation established between the self and the other makes the whole information a potential communication. The other is both whom the self addressed, as the third who are spoken. Mass communication, although in a mediated way, resorts this dimension and that’s why is capable of contacting distant lines. The symbolic power of mass communication is to visualize or silence those lines. Interpretations/re-interpretations of what the newspapers produced about the referendum in Pará, identified in the research, finalize the exploratory study. Some of them are: the referendum was treated as party elections, ensuring victory to "No" and defeat the "Yes", when, in fact, it was a popular consultation; Carajás and Tapajós united in opposition to Belém, however the two territories had different reasons for the division; the image associated with the Carajás and Tapajós are the male politicians; both newspapers saw the referendum as breaking, splitting, cropping and economic loss, mainly.
  • Carregando...
    Imagem de Miniatura
    ItemAcesso aberto (Open Access)
    Sim ou Não? O plebiscito no Pará em 2011, estratégias discursivas e sentidos nas campanhas televisivas
    (Universidade Federal do Pará, 2015-02-20) AQUINO, Evelyn Cristina Ferreira de; SEIXAS, Netília Silva dos Anjos; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2301685130625189
    The purpose of this study was to observe how were the discursive strategies in television campaigns of pro and against fronts the creation of the states of Carajás and Tapajós plebiscite in 2011, in Pará, and what senses offered by these strategies. In 2011, the Pará population went to the polls with a great responsibility at hand: it was the first time that the citizen was called to decide on the creation of states. Provided by the 1988 Constitution, reasoned by the law 9709, which provides the participation of the population to decide on dismemberment of territories and creation of new states and by the Resolution 23,354, which provided for the organization and conduct of the plebiscite campaign, the plebiscite marked the history of country. The ancient longing of territorial reorganization in the Amazon come from its own constitution as a society founded on the myth of the territorial unit. Discussions on the need to reconfigure the state map to allow an administration to reach its area and provide local development also served to give effect to the principles of a political division, with a variety of interests. The campaign on television began on November 11 and ended on 7 December. In all, 80 programs were produced, disseminated to 12h-12h10 and 19h30-19h40. 20 programs were analyzed, 10 "yes" and 10 "no". The analysis was based on assumptions that pro fronts and against the creation of states of Carajás and Tapajós plebiscite in 2011 presented their programs in a process of interaction, one in response to the other, and from also, built their strategies and speeches, and that campaigns have appropriated a historical and cultural process of (re) discursive production about Pará to build their arguments. The methodological procedures involved the use of the method discourse analysis in the dialogical dimension of Mikhail Bakhtin. Other important authors were Antonio Fausto Neto, to understand the discursive strategies; Eliseo Verón on political discourse, enunciation and statement; Vera França and Adriano Duarte Rodrigues, about the discussion of communicative interaction. The analysis showed that fronts campaigns worked with discursive strategies wich have offered two macrospeeches: the discourse of the integrity and unity of the population against the division, by appeals to culture (fronts of the "no") and the discourse of the new states as the only solution to all problems of Pará, through the presentation of economic factors (fronts of the "yes"). Other speeches found were the territorial integrity; developmentalism; the states that have worked; of land area; abandonment and ungovernability; external interference and failed states. Even with the victory of the "no" to the division, the consequences of this result and discussion are far from stagnating. Analyze the plebiscite of TV campaigns was a way of understanding the Amazon. For a complex and heterogeneous region with difficulties to be thought, only a cyclical and amplified methodology may account for its extension not only territorial but, above all, historical, social, political and discursive.
Logo do RepositórioLogo do Repositório
Nossas Redes:

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Configurações de Cookies
  • Política de Privacidade
  • Termos de Uso
  • Entre em Contato
Brasão UFPA