Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6488
metadata.dc.type: | Artigo de Periódico |
Issue Date: | Feb-2015 |
metadata.dc.creator: | SILVA, Priscilla Flores BRITO, Marcus Vinicius Henriques PONTES, Flávia Sirotheau Corrêa RAMOS, Suzana Rodrigues MENDES, Laís Cordeiro OLIVEIRA, Louize Caroline Marques |
metadata.dc.description.affiliation: | SILVA, P. F.; PONTES, F. S. C.; MENDES, L. C.; OLIVEIRA, L. C. M. Universidade Federal do Pará |
Title: | Copaiba oil effect on experimental jaw defect in Wistar rats |
Citation: | SILVA, Priscilla Flores et al. Copaiba oil effect on experimental jaw defect in Wistar rats. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, São Paulo, v. 30, n. 2, p. 120-126, Feb. 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015002000006. Disponível em: http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6488. Acesso em:. |
Abstract: | PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of copaiba oil on jaw defects repair in Wistar rats treated with bioglass or adipose tissue. METHODS: A jaw defect was randomly created in forty-two rats and filled with bioglass or adipose tissue. The two groups (Gbio and Gcell) were subdivided in three subgroups with seven animals each according to gavage administration: control (distillated water), oil (copaiba oil) and melox (meloxicam). Euthanasia was performed after forty post-operative days. The bone formation was analyzed regarding the histological aspects. RESULTS: The osteoclasts activity was observed only in four subgroups (p=0.78). Regarding the osteoblasts presence, it was very similar between the subgroups, the difference was due to Gcell-melox (p=0.009) that presented less osteoblastic activity. The inflammatory cells were more evident in Gcell-melox subgroup, however, there was no difference in comparison with the other subgroups (p=0.52). Bone formation was observed in all subgroups, just two animals showed no bone formation even after 40 days. More than 50% of bone matrix mineralization was observed in 56% (23 animals) of the analyzed areas. The bone matrix mineralization was not different between subgroups (p=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The subgroups that received copaiba oil showed bone repair, although not statistically significant in comparison to subgroups treated whit meloxicam or controls. Copaiba oil administered by gavage had no effect on bone repair in this experimental model. |
Keywords: | Plantas medicinais Óleo de copaíba Regeneração óssea Anti-inflamatórios Rato como animal de laboratório Plants Medicinal Bone regeneration Anti-Inflammatory agents |
Series/Report no.: | Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira |
ISSN: | 1678-2674 |
Publisher: | Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
metadata.dc.publisher.initials: | SOBRADPEC |
metadata.dc.rights: | Acesso Aberto |
metadata.dc.source.uri: | http://ref.scielo.org/t7654c |
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015002000006 |
Appears in Collections: | Artigos Científicos - FOUFPA/ICS |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Article_CopaibaOilEffect.pdf | 654,17 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License