Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6488
Tipo: Artigo de Periódico
Data do documento: Fev-2015
Autor(es): SILVA, Priscilla Flores
BRITO, Marcus Vinicius Henriques
PONTES, Flávia Sirotheau Corrêa
RAMOS, Suzana Rodrigues
MENDES, Laís Cordeiro
OLIVEIRA, Louize Caroline Marques
Afiliação do(s) Autor(es): SILVA, P. F.; PONTES, F. S. C.; MENDES, L. C.; OLIVEIRA, L. C. M. Universidade Federal do Pará
Título: Copaiba oil effect on experimental jaw defect in Wistar rats
Citar como: SILVA, Priscilla Flores et al. Copaiba oil effect on experimental jaw defect in Wistar rats. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, São Paulo, v. 30, n. 2, p. 120-126, Feb. 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015002000006. Disponível em: http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6488. Acesso em:.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of copaiba oil on jaw defects repair in Wistar rats treated with bioglass or adipose tissue. METHODS: A jaw defect was randomly created in forty-two rats and filled with bioglass or adipose tissue. The two groups (Gbio and Gcell) were subdivided in three subgroups with seven animals each according to gavage administration: control (distillated water), oil (copaiba oil) and melox (meloxicam). Euthanasia was performed after forty post-operative days. The bone formation was analyzed regarding the histological aspects. RESULTS: The osteoclasts activity was observed only in four subgroups (p=0.78). Regarding the osteoblasts presence, it was very similar between the subgroups, the difference was due to Gcell-melox (p=0.009) that presented less osteoblastic activity. The inflammatory cells were more evident in Gcell-melox subgroup, however, there was no difference in comparison with the other subgroups (p=0.52). Bone formation was observed in all subgroups, just two animals showed no bone formation even after 40 days. More than 50% of bone matrix mineralization was observed in 56% (23 animals) of the analyzed areas. The bone matrix mineralization was not different between subgroups (p=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The subgroups that received copaiba oil showed bone repair, although not statistically significant in comparison to subgroups treated whit meloxicam or controls. Copaiba oil administered by gavage had no effect on bone repair in this experimental model.
Palavras-chave: Plantas medicinais
Óleo de copaíba
Regeneração óssea
Anti-inflamatórios
Rato como animal de laboratório
Plants
Medicinal
Bone regeneration
Anti-Inflammatory agents
Título do Periódico: Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira
ISSN: 1678-2674
Instituição: Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
Sigla da Instituição: SOBRADPEC
Tipo de Acesso: Acesso Aberto
Fonte URI: http://ref.scielo.org/t7654c
Identificador DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015002000006
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos Científicos - FOUFPA/ICS

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Article_CopaibaOilEffect.pdf654,17 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons