Teses em Educação (Doutorado) - PPGED/ICED
URI Permanente para esta coleçãohttps://repositorio.ufpa.br/handle/2011/2736
O Doutorado Acadêmico pertence ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação (PPGED) do Instituto de Ciências da Educação (ICED) da Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA).
Navegar
Navegando Teses em Educação (Doutorado) - PPGED/ICED por Orientadores "HAGE, Salomao Antonio Mufarrej"
Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Alternância pedagógica na formação do educador: contribuições da licenciatura em educação do campo a partir da Unifesspa(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2019-03-01) FARIAS, Maria Celeste Gomes de; HAGE, Salomao Antonio Mufarrej; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1723722364556016The thesis aimed to identify and analyze the contributions of the Pedagogical Alternation developed in the Course of Licenciatura in Education of the Field, at the Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará - UNIFESSPA, for training of the educators, regarding the principles of the education of the field. The research was based on assumptions of a qualitative nature, having as instruments of data collection the documentary analysis; participant research; semi-structured interviews. For the data collection fifteen students were interviewed; seven LPEC trainers and two representatives of the Social Movement - MST. The organization and analysis of the data is structured in four Axes I-Pedagogical Alternation in the formation of the educator: contributions that Focus on the dynamics of the Schools, Communities of the field and University; Axis II - Pedagogical Alternation: training, work and land in the training practices of the field educator; Axis III- Pedagogical Alternation Contributions to a Human Formation, Field Educator's Policy; Axis IV - Pedagogical alternation in the formation of the educator and the Production of Knowledge based on the practices of educational research. The structure of the thesis is organized in four chapters. In the first one we present the hegemonic conceptions of formation and the counter hegemonic from the perspective of the Field Education Movement and the development of the Degree in Field Education in Brazil. In the second chapter we expose the theoretical principles of methodological of the Pedagogy of Alternation and the Pedagogical Alternation in the formation of the educator of the field. In the third chapter we present the historical social context of the Region of Southeast of Pará where it is located of UNIFESSPA we present the organization of the Pedagogical Alternation in the Course LPEC. In the fourth chapter we analyze the data structured in the four Thematic Axes from the view of the subjects of the formative process highlighting the contributions of the Pedagogical Alternation in the formation of the educator of the field. The results of the research led us to identify several contributions of the alternation. The contributions point to the materiality of the principles of Field Education as educational practices that affect the reality of schools and communities that value culture, knowledge and knowledge of the people; the alternation contributes to a formation has as formative matrix the relation with the land and the work of the subjects of the field; the contribution of alternance points to a human and political formation of the educator, as well as alternation contributes to the production of knowledge socially committed to the working class of the field.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Educação do campo no Amazonas: história e diálogos com as territorialidades das águas, das terras e das florestas(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-12-18) VASCONCELOS, Maria Eliane de Oliveira; HAGE, Salomao Antonio Mufarrej; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1723722364556016The construction of the Field Education History has roots in the social movements of struggle for the land, that is articulated to the struggles for the water and forests. The education of rural people was marked by assistancialism and by the denial of cultural, social and environmental diversity, while historically, strategies of resistance were built to face this reality of exclusion. In the 1980s, 1990s and the beginning of the 21st century there were articulations of different social movements and popular organizations in the struggles for education. As a result, legislation was approved to include Field Education in the agenda of Brazilian public policy. However, the effectiveness of this policy depends on the mobilization of the collective subjects of the field in each state or municipality. This study analyzed the construction of the Field Education History in the Amazon from the experiences of participation of collective subjects of the field in dialogue with the socio-cultural diversity of the rural peoples and from the territorialities of territories of water, lands and forests, in the period of 1980 to 2015. The investigative path based on a dialogical perspective and historical perspective, with the use of oral sources, through thematic oral history methodology and documentary sources, which were collected from February to October 2016, and in May 2017. We used data triangulation, which allowed the analysis of these through the dialogue between oral sources, documentary sources and the theoretical perspective. The construction of the Field Education History in the Amazon is articulated with the trajectory of social movements and popular organizations of the 1980s and 1990s, such as the MEB/AM, the Ribeirinho do Amazonas Movement, GRANAV and NEPE/UFAM, which acted in the area of popular education and problematized the reality of the education of the rural people and the questions concerning the territories of water, lands and forests; problems that are also highlighted by other collective subjects of the beginning of the 21st century. Influenced by the historical context of extensive mobilizations and debates around the Field Education at the national level, different collective subjects from Amazonas such as: INCRA/PRONERA/AM, UFAM, UEA, IFAM, CPT/AM, FETAGRI/AM, Boa Vista do Ramos and SEMED/Manaus, mobilize for the Field Education in Amazonas, demonstrating that this Education is under construction, in debate, in movement. And as a result of this construction, we defend the thesis that the History of Field Education in the Amazon dialogues with the territorialities of water, lands and forests, and with the diversity of the world of work, articulated to the protagonism of collective subjects of the field that has been deepening the debate on Field Education in the Amazon.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Política de formação de educadores do campo e a construção da contra-hegemonia via epistemologia da práxis: análise da experiência da Ledoc-Ufpa-Cametá(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-12-19) SILVA, Hellen do Socorro de Araújo; HAGE, Salomao Antonio Mufarrej; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1723722364556016This study deals with the training policy of the rural educators, based on the training experience of the Licentiate Course in Field Education (LEDOC) of the Federal University of Pará, Tocantins Campus in Cametá-PA. Our objective was to analyze how the training policy for field educators ensures the principles of the field of education through reference counter-hegemonic in the Course of Degree in Education of the Field in the UFPA, Campus of the Tocantins in Cametá. The methodology was based on the historical and dialectical materialism so that we could understand the formation of collective field subjects and their acts of resistance by a differentiated training that meets their realities and diversity as people of the field, water and forests. In the methodological procedures used literature review, documentary and field research. As data collection technique, we used semi-structured interviews, questionnaire applied to characterize the students of the Course and conducted participant observation. The results showed that the Degree in Field Education, as a policy for the training of educators in the process of consolidation, amid tensions and contradictions for the approval of the Pedagogical Project, is linked to the principles of Field Education, among to which we highlight: interdisciplinary practice, training by area of knowledge, resistance / affirmation of the teaching identity, students' entrance, pedagogic alternation and the transformation of the country school; which in its essence signal a counter-hegemonic training in higher education referenced by the epistemology of practice.