Teses em Educação (Doutorado) - PPGED/ICED
URI Permanente para esta coleçãohttps://repositorio.ufpa.br/handle/2011/2736
O Doutorado Acadêmico pertence ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação (PPGED) do Instituto de Ciências da Educação (ICED) da Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA).
Navegar
Navegando Teses em Educação (Doutorado) - PPGED/ICED por Afiliação "UFPA - Universidade Federal do Pará"
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Infância pobre e educação no juízo de órfão do Pará (1870-1910): acolher, proteger, cuidar e educar “os filhos do estado”(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2019-06-27) SABINO, Elianne Barreto; ALVES, Laura Maria da Silva Araújo; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6009592378453661Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Práticas educativas populares na licenciatura em educação do campo, no território da Amazônia tocantina(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2019-06-25) SILVA, Maria Divanete Sousa da; HAGE, Salomão Antônio Mufarrej; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1723722364556016; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-0696This study guides the Graduation Course of Field Education offered by the Federal University of Pará, Campus Cametá-PA, in the territory of the Tocantins region of the Amazon. Our reflections are centered in the analysis of the relationship that this course establishes between the qualification of the field educators and the popular educative practices for understanding them as educative processes of human formation which come true by means of the organizations, associations, social and union movements in the perspective of the social transformation. The study has its bases in the Dialectic Historical Materialism to understand the movement that involves the formation of field educators in the context of the popular educative practices, enhancing the action of the educators in the popular spaces in the perspective of the transformative praxis. We anchor to the concept of praxis, from the Marxist theory and the Freirean conception, for we understand that both result in human intervention in the reality in the perspective of transforming it. The theoretical venture was based on the conceptual categories: Formation of Field Educators, Field Education, Territory and Popular Educative Practice. The study was developed from the bibliographical and documental analysis and field research. We used the questionnaire for data gathering, with both open and closed questions, participant observation, and semi-structured interview. The information gathered allowed us to construct three axes of analyses which aimed at identifying the LEDOC contributions in the construction and affirmations of popular educative practices, in the formation of field educators, they are: 1) The Tocantins region of the Amazon as a territory of conflicts, resistance and of action of the field educator; 2) The LEDOC as a request of the Social Field Movements of the Tocantins region of the Amazon, the entrance of the 2014 class and the reconfiguration of the Pedagogical Project of the Course; 3) The materiality of the formation in the LEDOC: challenges, tensions and possibilities. The results reveal that the Graduation Course of Field Education contributes with the statement that popular educative practices, especially with the definition of the formative axes that structure the curriculum for they include in their curricular components: Studies of Popular Educative Practices and Traineeship in Popular Organizations which, by means of tensions, limitations and possibilities, enhance the acting of the field educators in the spaces of the organizations and social movements that exist in the territory of the Tocantins region of the Amazon.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Representações sociais sobre crianças e infâncias em teses e dissertações da Amazônia(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2019-02-25) TRINDADE, Marileia Pereira; NASCIMENTO, Ivany Pinto; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6649004854958284This study deals with the social representations about children and childhood present in theses and dissertations of the Amazon. The main objective of this research is to: apprehend the social representations about children and childhood in theses and dissertations of graduate programs in education in the Amazon that have developed research with children. The theoretical field of this thesis was supported by the following tripod: social representations, children and childhood and research with children. The first theoretical field relies on such authors as: Moscovici (2003), Birth (2014), Jovchelovitch (2014) and Marková (2017). The second theoretical field is mainly based on: Bujes (2000, 2002); Quinteiro (2002); Faria, Demartini and Prado (2009); Corsaro (2011); Del Priore (2010); Ariès (2014); Qvortrup (2014, 2015) and Sarmento (2005, 2013, 2015). The third theoretical field is based on: Soares; Sarmento; Tomás (2005); Mullër; Redin (2007); Müller; Carvalho (2009); Oak; Müller (2010); Lee (2010); Agostinho (2010); Son; Barbosa (2010) and Fernandes (2016). This is a bibliographical study with a qualitative approach. It constitutes the corpus of analysis 2 theses and 20 dissertations registered in the Bank of Thesis and Dissertations of Capes. For the data analysis, we used the techniques of content analysis proposed by Bardin (1977), which involved the steps of pre-analysis, material exploration and treatment of results, inference and interpretation. In this process of analysis we identify meanings about children and childhoods, from which we perceive objections and anchorages that make up the social representations about children and childhoods present in the analyzed productions. The results revealed meanings about children and childhood, listed as follows: 1) senses about childhood: childhood as historical, social and cultural construction; childhood as a social category of the generational type; childhood as an individual life time; 2) senses about child: child as social actor; child as subject of law; play and imaginary as essential elements for children; 3) senses about the children of the Amazon: the children of the Amazon are immersed in daily activities; the natural environment is an important element in the daily life of children; the life of children is permeated by universal and unique aspects. Based on these meanings, we have grasped the following objections and anchorages about children and childhood: childhood has an image of a permanent social structure, anchored in the sense of a social category of the generational type, the individual image, anchored in the meaning of individual life time lived by the subject and the image of diversity, anchored in the changes through which childhood permeates both from a structural and individual perspective; children are characterized by the image of a social actor, anchored in their agency about the world and the image of plural subjects, which denotes that children live in a specific childhood, coexist in a multiplicity of social contexts and seize the most diverse social elements arising from their life contexts and other contexts with which they establish relationships. Faced with these images about children and childhood, the thesis is that the authors of the analyzed productions, when developing research with children, have social representations about children and childhoods sustained in the social valorization of them. They recognize the protagonism of children and the notoriety of childhood in the social world.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) As transformações no mundo do trabalho e as implicações na formação dos pescadores artesanais na Amazônia tocantina(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2019-02-28) BARRA, José Domingos Fernandes; SILVA, Gilmar Pereira da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7624395840820523This thesis examines the transformations of the world of work and its implications for the training of artisanal fishermen in the municipality of Cametá, on the banks of the Tocantins River in the state of Pará. It is a work that shows the changes that have changed the life of the fisherman. The reconfiguration of their life dynamics and the strategies adopted for these fishermen to form, faced with the demands of the contemporary world, from the various forms of interaction that are established in the work in relation to the river. This is a qualitative research that uses the case study. To carry out this research, a bibliographic survey was carried out on the ground in the bordering communities of the Amazon tocantina, in particular in the communities of Rio Ovidio and Joroca de baixo, in the municipality of Cametá, where interviews were conducted. semi-structured questionnaires and participant observation. We process informant statements via content analysis. Among the categories of work, training and qualification, we seek the theoretical orientation of research in Marx (2008), Gramsci (1987, 1988, 2006), Antunes (2003, 2006, 2009, 2013), Diegues (2015), Marx and Engels (2006, 2007), among others. The analyzes led to investigations of what is expected of working in a peripheral territory, in a peripheral Amazonia. It was also important to realize that in this world of work, artisanal fishermen are “framed” in a unilateral perspective, based on the logic of global capitalism, where rural territories are invisible in the field of artisanal fisheries. On the other hand, it is possible to highlight the resistance, the forms that these fishermen have sought to confront in the world of work, since the human formation in the Christian communities and the Prelature of Cametá and, consecutively, in the logic social movements, referring to the Cametá Z-16 fishing colony, which has influenced the constitutive process or the production of knowledge or forms of participation and has, through a dialectical process, redefined their knowledge by adapting social practices and economic. There have been changes in the world of work that have resulted in the process of establishing the artisanal fisherman, because the world of work is in contradiction with the changes made to the fishing territories, while giving access to the necessary consumer goods, lifestyle with quality; combined with this, conviviality with environmental problems, intensified by the practice of work, by the cultural actions coming from the capital, generated conflicts, migrations and a proletarianization of the fisherman