Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia - PPGFIL/IFCH
URI Permanente desta comunidadehttps://repositorio.ufpa.br/handle/2011/5862
O Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia (PPGFIL) do Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas (IFCH) da Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA). Foi criado em dezembro de 2010 e iniciou suas atividades efetivas em agosto de 2011, como curso de Mestrado em Filosofia, sendo o único na área em toda a Região Norte.
Navegar
Navegando Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia - PPGFIL/IFCH por CNPq "CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA::ETICA"
Agora exibindo 1 - 7 de 7
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) A banalidade do mal e a faculdade de pensar: política e ética nas reflexões de Hanna Arendt(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-04-07) MOREIRA, Elzanira Rosa Mello; BARROS, Roberto de Almeida Pereira de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4521253027948817This work presents Hannah Arendt's about of evil, and its connection to the thinking and judging college, which gained new impetus at the Nazi trial of Adolf Eichmann. From the reflections on the problem of evil, Arendt turns to the activities of the spirit, raising questions about the thought, related to the phenomenon of evil. In Arendt's analysis, thought has as its activity the search for meanings and its purpose is communication with itself. Moving away from the orthodoxy of the Kantian texts, in his investigations of the judgment, Arendt understands in the aesthetic judgment of Kant the political condition of the judgment. In constant dialogue with Kant's work, Arendt is occupied with several concepts contained in the Critique of the College of Judgment, a work that considers Kant's political philosophy. Hannah Arendt reinterprets the college of judgment to demonstrate its political function, which serves citizens to distinguish right from wrong. The Kantian work allows us to understand the perception and the interpretive movement of Arendt. Through the analysis of the reflections of Hannah Arendt we seek to understand the author's perception about the functioning of the college of thinking and judging the political facts.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) O belo e o sublime em Kant nas fases pré-critica e crítica: ruptura ou continuidade?(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-04-17) SOUSA, Jeandersonn Pereira de; SOUZA, Luís Eduardo Ramos de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7892900979434696The objective of this study is to investigate the concepts of the Beautiful and the Sublime in Kant by means of the confrontation between two works of his aesthetic philosophy: one of the pre-Critical period, the Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime of 1764, and the other of the Critical period, the Critique of the Faculty of Judge of 1790. The central question to be investigated in this research is the following: there is rupture or conceptual continuity in Kant's reflection on the beautiful and the sublime in these two works belonging to distinct periods of his philosophy? The path followed to clarify this problem was divided into three stages: 1) to analyze and discuss how the concepts of the beautiful and the sublime constitute the work of the pre-critical phase; 2) to examine and to discuss how the concepts of the beautiful and the sublime constitute the work of the critical phase; 3) Identify and present, the similarities and dissimilarities, in the treatment of matter in the two works in particular. At the end of this study, the thesis will be defended that, despite subjectivity appearing in the first writing and being an essential part of the second writing, because it characterizes the ground of determination in the subject through the feeling of pleasure and displeasure, the comparison Between the two writings he considers that there is a rupture, much more than a continuity, in Kant's way of thinking the concepts of the beautiful and the sublime in the said works.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Os "bons europeus" e a "nova síntese" no pensamento nietzschiano(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2021-04-26) FEITOSA, Wesley Leite; CHAVES, Ernani Pinheiro; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5741253213910825; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8988-1910This paper consists in a philological – hermeneutics analysis about the philosophical oustpread from Nietzsche’s concepts of “good european” as a fundamental question in his task of overcoming moral. The term “good- european” occurs in two specific parts in Nietzsche’s work. The first mention is in his intermediate texts (1876 – 1882), in which the author talks about culture, language and metaphysical issues. At this period the philosopher argues about subject formation and the cultural processes of coercion on the subject that condionate human thought and behavior. This approach evokes the necessity of a manner to elaborate a task in order to overcome the morality about the concept of free spirit. The concepts of “good european” and free spirit are associated as synonyms in his intermediate work phase, being the first term a manner to enphasize the necessity of overcoming and detaching the nations issue and talks about German nationalism in the 1900s. In his late work (1883-1889) the term “good european” is reintroduced in a new contexto through that the author develops his critics on moral and the overcoming an ethnocentric concept in modern european thought. Thus, Nietzsche stablishes hierarchic and overcome levels: 1. European; 2. Supraeuropean; 3. Asian; 4. Greek. Supraeuropean concept designates a perspective that the Europe itself must be exceed. In this perspective the being needs to be not only supranational but supraeuropean intending to overcome an european vision and the reach of a wider vision about the Western culture. Nietzsche tries to extinguish his western partiality and propounds an Asian perspective in Europe via the concept of Supraasiatic. The supraasiatic level represents a moral overcome in comparison to an european moral, relating this idea to the supraeuropean concept. This concept characterizes a radical objection to the Western and its values as a cultural consequence from Europe. Finally, the author highlightsa greek theoretical foundation as a model to the so called “Europeans from the future” in a denominated greek ideal. This ideal represents a higher view in comparison to the previous ideals and characterizes his cosmopolitan idea about europe culture, in terms of its cultural synthesis. From that perspective Nietzsche describes a non-stop process according to atavistic procedures and diferentiation processes in which a “new synthesis” of philological, linguistics and culture can be possible.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Entre sátiros e silenos: ou a dimensão trágica da filosofia no Banquete de Platão(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2017-06-01) PAMPLONA, Matheus Jorge do Couto Abreu; SOUZA, Jovelina Maria Ramos de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0475424515288539This thesis aims at showing how philosophy, though negatively defined in the Symposium, brings with it a feature that is essentially tragic. Although in the athenian tragedy what we call tragic conflict was mainly set from the perspective of the difference between the human sphere and the divine, in Plato, on the contrary, such a conflict is so secularized that we can actually conceive through a philosophical process of education the possibility to overcome the contingencies of fate or whatever transcends human capacities. Otherwise, we may say that the failure of this task inevitably results in tragedy.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) A Parresia nos cursos de Foucault de 1982-1984: ética, politica e estética(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2021-09-01) CORDEIRO FILHO, Flávio de Lima; CHAVES, Ernani Pinheiro; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5741253213910825; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8988-1910Michel Foucault's work (1926-1984) has a great conceptual scope, covering topics such as Madness, Power and even his debate on Truth. The focus of this dissertation will be his final writings, referring to the years 1982 to 1984, as it is within the courses given at the Collège de France where Foucault will work more specifically on notions of ethics, aesthetics and truth. Michel Foucault makes a return to classical antiquity, however such return has a specific concept in mind: parresia. Parresía is translated by Foucault as “courage of the truth”, “speakout”, “saying everything”, but the focus of the analysis of the French philosopher will be how such concept is deeply linked with the philosophical practice of antiquity, going through since from the political consequences of the use of parresia, the construction of an ethos, which in turn is linked with an aesthetic of the “true-tell”. Foucault will show that the concern with Truth is not only related to the epistemological debate between truth versus falsehood, that is, it is not in the French philosopher's interest to enter into the discussion of what makes a discourse and/or knowledge true. Foucault wants to investigate what makes the subject someone who tells the truth and how he is recognized as one who carries a true discourse. We realize that there is in Foucault a concern for the truth as the subject's trainer, how is frank speaking an influence in the formation of a subject? With that, Foucault claims that he will leave aside the “epistemological structures” to be concerned with the analysis of the “alleturgical forms” of the act of uttering the truth. Foucault will differentiate between “know yourself” and “take care of yourself” both Socratic formulations, however as each will develop and formulate distinct doctrines in the history of philosophy, while the former will hold a In the more epistemological/ metaphysical development of Socratic philosophy, the second will stick to a way of life, that is, a Socratic ethics. However, Foucault points out conditions for effecting parresia, in addition to the need to say everything, there is an urgent need to be a discourse totally linked to the thought of the one who speaks, so it is not merely an artificial speech. That is why the French philosopher says that parresia is not a mere adequacy of speech and thought, as the masters do, it is necessary to take a kind of vital risk, which will hurt and irritate the other, reaching the point of extreme violence, as soon as at the risk of losing the bond with the other. That is why it is important to emphasize the essential difference between rhetoric and parresia, placing the two attitudes in diametrically opposite ways, while one is a speech without any link with the interlocutor and with what is being said, parresia is a connection between the interlocutors , a bond so strong that it sets precedents for the rejection, punishment and revenge of the one who told the truth.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Silêncio e abertura na arte contemporânea: reflexões a partir de Heidegger(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2018-03-28) FERREIRA, Yasmin Pires; SOUZA JÚNIOR, Nelson José de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7150345624593204Starting from the place that silence occupies in the thought of Martin Heidegger as an element capable of provoking different perceptions of the world, this research intends to create a discussion about the use of silence as a factor of openness in contemporary art. We believe that, in the peculiarity of its existence in a social scenario dominated by technique, silence can cause a genuine experience in the public. In order to achieve its goals, this work will situate silence as an authentic form of language manifestation in Heidegger, and will also bring John Cage's understanding of it to the analysis, given its paradigmatic character and relevance in the context of the contemporary arts. Finally, we will be analyzing artworks that corroborate the exposed proposal, in an approximation with the notions of openness and art experience.Item Acesso aberto (Open Access) Soberania e governamentalidade: Foucault, leitor de Rousseau(Universidade Federal do Pará, 2019-09-10) BEZERRA, Marco Antonio Correa; CHAVES, Ernani Pinheiro; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5741253213910825The general purpose of this work is to show how the legal juridical conception of power in the eighteenth century enabled the wide understanding of the term governmentality as the political strategies were directed to the population control as exposed in the Security, Territory, Population course, taught by Michel Foucault at the Collège de France in 1977-1978. To accomplish such aim, we will start from the critical confrontation that Foucault establishes with the idea of sovereign power within the called Modern State in Jean Jacques Rousseau. From this focus we intend to indicate, initially, that the Genevan philosopher when wrote the entry Political Economy in the Encyclopedia (1755), aims to present the need for an economic and administrative management about people’s possessions and lives, then registers the Social Contract (1762) as a logical extension of his two essays (1749 and 1755). This way, Rousseau seeks to legitimize the members of the society behavior, for this, the citizen need to delegate his individual and particular power towards a general will. In the course mentioned above, Foucault criticizes precisely this notion of sovereignty, because the Frenchman identifies that there is an intermediate body [government] equipped with a legal apparatus that becomes in practice a camouflaged government management, whose main tools are security devices to regulate the population. This idea of a government as a population government uses techniques of power, that is, technological devices to regulate the members of this state, in developing a controlling method under the guise of a discourse for the welfare of the population.