Artigos Científicos - ICJ
URI Permanente para esta coleçãohttps://repositorio.ufpa.br/handle/2011/3079
Navegar
Navegando Artigos Científicos - ICJ por Autor "MAGALHÃES, Breno Baía"
Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Artigo de Periódico Acesso aberto (Open Access) O Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional na ADPF 347 e a sedução do Direito: o impacto da medida cautelar e a resposta dos poderes políticos(Fundação Getulio Vargas, 2019) MAGALHÃES, Breno BaíaThis article intends to analyze the State of Unconstitutional Affairs from the evaluation of the impacts of the interim order granted by the STF in the three branches of the Republic and the possibility of social changes from it. Dealing with the decision of the STF in ADPF 347 as a decision that creates political paths to be covered by the involved agents, in this case, the Executive, Legisla tive and Judicial powers, it seeks to evaluate the feasibility of the answers pre sented in order to reach, or not, the requirements formulated by the judicial decision. The data collected in the scope of the powers were contrasted with the objectives of the interim orders and with the justifications of the State of Unconstitutional Affairs. Next, the article argues for the impossibility of changes in the factual situation presented through legal categories, based on Gerald Rosenberg’s theses on social changes through law. The study concludes that the granted interim orders are not effective, because the powers presented answers that follow the same nature of the policies traditionally developed in Brazil, and that a social change is unlikely through the declaration of the State of Unconstitutional AffairsArtigo de Periódico Acesso aberto (Open Access) A incrível doutrina de um caso só: análise do estado de coisas inconstitucional na ADPF 347(Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 2019) MAGALHÃES, Breno BaíaThe article intends to make a dogmatic analysis of ADPF 347, a judicial precedent that inserted the category State of Unconstitutional Affairs (SUA) in the interpretative canon of the Brazilian Constitutional Law. The creation of said category implies the delimitation of its elements for their characterization and application in later cases. Thus, as a scientific method, the article intends to perform a dogmatic analysis of the elements that make up the identification of an SUA, according to the decision taken by the Federal Supreme Court (FSC). The dogmatic study proceeded from a description of its constitutional contours, that is, the requirements for the declaration of the ECI and its characteristics, to then challenge the constitutional characterization of the category under consideration and to highlight the mobilization of the FSC justices in order to limit its applicability only to the case of the prison system. The study concludes that the dogmatic categorie is problematic from the point of view of its argumentative coherence and its application will be restricted to the case of the Brazilian prison system.Artigo de Periódico Acesso aberto (Open Access) A judicialização do refúgio no STJ: deferência ao executivo e incoerência interpretativa(Universidade Federal do Paraná, 2019-04) MAGALHÃES, Breno Baía; CORRÊA, Gabriella Thaís SousaThe present article intends to analyze the jurisprudence of the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justiça, or STJ), in order to identify which hypotheses of judicialization of refuge, according to the categories stipulated by Jubilut (2011), are presented in that court and if there is or not judicial deference to the Executive branch decisions on expulsion or denial of refugee status. This empirical article analyzed the entire content of 13 decisions of the STJ, among full bench and monocratic decisions. The methodology employed is institutionalist, focused on the jurisprudential construction of the rules and their impact on the achievement of their purposes. The study concludes that the STJ developed a doctrine of great deference to the Executive branch, stressing the impossibility of judicial review of the merits of administrative decisions on issues related to Brazil’s foreign policy. Finally, we argue, as a future agenda for research, that the judicial trend of total deference may indicate a position of the Brazilian State regarding a foreign policy of non-reception of refugees.
